Brent Quarries and the Net Zero Challenge

The aggregate industry’s road to reducing GHG emissions

by: Warren Heeley

The Ontario Stone‭, ‬Sand and Gravel Association‭ (‬OSSGA‭) ‬and the aggregate industry in Ontario is committed to reducing its carbon‭ ‬footprint to meet the federal government’s targets for net zero emissions by 2050‭. ‬The industry plays a critical role in Ontario’s circular economy and is already a driving force contributing to carbon neutrality in many ways‭.‬

An industry plan to reach net-zero aggregates will capture these long-term and continuing business practices and chart a path towards net-zero‭. ‬However‭, ‬some OSSGA members have already started reducing emissions from their operations‭. ‬Both small and large‭-‬scale companies are working on steps towards a more sustainable future‭, ‬including operator Ron Brent‭, ‬from Brent Quarries‭. ‬

Brent Quarries‭: ‬moving forward sustainably

“Our company is already on the road to net zero‭,‬”‭ ‬says Ron Brent of Brent Quarries‭. ‬“We have implemented a series of sustainable solutions for our operations and will continue on this road until we meet the targets for 2050‭.‬”

Based in Port Carling Ontario‭, ‬this member company was started in 1990‭ ‬by the three Brent brothers‭. ‬One of the brothers was a contractor and had an ongoing need for small to medium volumes of aggregates that were difficult to obtain from the larger aggregate suppliers‭. ‬Starting Brent Quarries solved this initial challenge and opened up a whole new family business‭.‬

The company has steadily grown from 80‭ ‬to more than 3000‭ ‬acres of land and five quarry sites‭. ‬“Our hook with customers is that we are close to clients so the congestion on main roads in the province did not impact us and we‭ ‬could guarantee quick and on time delivery at a better price‭,‬”‭ ‬says Brent‭.‬

He went on to say that the net zero targets will be difficult for the industry but they are achievable‭. ‬Approaches like planting‭ ‬trees to offset carbon emissions for the aggregate industry is not going to work‭. ‬Instead his company has already started down‭ ‬the sustainability path in a number of ways‭.‬

Here are the steps that Brent Quarries has taken or will be taking in the near future‭.‬

Super insulated buildings‭ ‬–‭ ‬The buildings on Brent’s properties are wood construction and the inside is super insulated with spray-on foam insulation on the walls‭, ‬ceiling and under the floor‭. ‬This makes these buildings stronger‭, ‬quieter and better insulated than steel construction which is harder to insulate and therefore‭, ‬more difficult to maintain a good thermal barrier‭. ‬The building’s energy use is very low and it creates a good environment for workers when it is cold or hot outside‭. ‬

Buildings usable in winter‭ ‬–‭ ‬Property buildings have been designed to allow trucks to be kept inside during the winter which negates the need for truck warmup during colder weather‭. ‬The buildings also create a better environment for workers when maintenance is needed on company trucks and other equipment in the winter months‭.‬

Building heating‭ ‬–‭ ‬On company sites‭, ‬all buildings on the property are heated by a central boiler system that connects to each building by underground insulated pipes‭. ‬The system has two boilers connected to the loop‭; ‬one to provide heat for the system and one as a backup‭. ‬The boilers operate on wood waste pellets which makes the system carbon neutral and includes a heat extraction feature in the system‭.‬

Electric property grid‭ ‬–‭ ‬All of the five sites have a 44,000‭ ‬kilowatt line coming into the site that allows most operations‭ (‬including crushing in the future‭) ‬to be electrically run‭. ‬

Solar farms‭ ‬–‭ ‬Three of the five sites have 500‭ ‬kw solar farms that feed back into the property grid and provide 200‭ ‬per cent of the ongoing energy needs for the property‭. ‬The solar farms have been placed on land that is reclaimed‭, ‬or land that is not presently being used‭.‬

Hybrid trucks‭ ‬–‭ ‬“We are proud to say that we have found a way to convert our dump truck fleet to electric hybrids‭,‬”‭ ‬said Brent‭. ‬“A manufacturer in British Columbia makes available a kit that can be retrofitted into a dump truck to convert it to a diesel/electric hybrid‭. ‬We are actively pursuing this for our fleet and expect to have the first hybrid truck on the road in 12‭ ‬to 24‭ ‬months‭. ‬With transportation being the largest carbon emission challenge for our industry‭, ‬we see this as a major breakthrough for emissions reduction”‭ ‬

Rail aggregate shipping‭ ‬–‭ ‬The fifth site opened by Brent was about 700‭ ‬acres‭. ‬Brent saw an opportunity in this site to create a better way to transport aggregate to markets around the province‭. ‬The emissions from moving aggregate to distant markets by truck and the traffic gridlock created each day in urban areas makes transportation by rail a preferred option‭.‬

The new site has access to both CN and CP rail lines through the property‭. ‬Using rail would reduce shipping costs‭, ‬energy use and GHG emissions‭. ‬With maintenance costs rising for dump trucks and a shortage of dump truck drivers‭, ‬rail makes sense especially‭ ‬considering the difficulty being encountered in shipping aggregate by truck to large urban areas like the GTA‭. ‬“Rail is a good sustainable option‭, ‬so we are preparing for it‭,‬“‭ ‬stated Brent‭. ‬

Brent concluded by saying‭, ‬“Does our company agree with the net zero targets‭? ‬Yes‭, ‬we do‭. ‬Fossil fuels are becoming a precious commodity and should only be‭ ‬used when there is no other alternative like the situation currently with aircraft‭. ‬Putting aircraft use aside‭, ‬there are so many other energy options in our industry where fossil fuels can be replaced with alternative energy sources that are more sustainable‭. ‬It’s our job to implement as many of these options as possible to reduce the carbon loading in our environment‭.‬”

OSSGA going forward

A plan to reach net zero by 2025‭ ‬is currently being developed by the OSSGA Board and Environment Committee‭. ‬It will entail establishing a series of key performance indicators‭ (‬KPIs‭) ‬to track progress within the industry and set goals for future targets‭. ‬Most importantly‭, ‬the plan will provide practical approaches and methods to make day to day aggregate processes sustainable‭, ‬recognizing that it may not be a‭ ‬“one-size-fits-all”‭ ‬solution for members‭. ‬

Steps like switching to grid supplied electricity‭, ‬fleet/equipment updates‭, ‬utilizing alternative fuel sources‭, ‬recycling‭, ‬and switching from loaders to conveyors will all contribute to reductions in greenhouse gas‭ (‬GHG‭) ‬emissions in the industry‭. ‬However‭,‬‭ ‬transportation emissions are the largest output of GHGs in the aggregate industry and will obviously be a key target for reductions‭. ‬

The transportation part of the plan will go hand in hand with the industry position on the need for‭ ‬“close to market”‭ ‬aggregate supply chains and the impact it will have on reducing emissions‭. ‬To address this‭, ‬the industry is also looking at alternative aggregate delivery systems and obstacles to transporting aggregate by rail in Ontario‭.‬

In the interim‭, ‬OSSGA sees opportunities to raise awareness of the need to adapt processes to lower emissions‭, ‬communicate best‭ ‬practices and new technologies to the membership‭, ‬and develop industry environmental product declarations‭ (‬EPDs‭). ‬There is also‭ ‬a proposal to introduce a new OSSGA‭ ‬“net zero award”‭ ‬to help incentivize members to make their operations more sustainable and showcase examples of industry initiatives‭. ‬

The road to net zero is going to be a challenge but it will also provide the aggregate industry with opportunities to audit their fleets‭, ‬buildings‭, ‬and processes and identify ways they can reduce emissions‭, ‬improve waste recovery and even save money‭. ‬For‭ ‬an industry that is so critical to so many aspects of people’s lifestyles whether it is the roads and bridges they drive on‭, ‬the homes they live in or the buildings they work in‭, ‬net-zero aggregates is a shared commitment to a more sustainable future‭.‬

Leaving a Legacy

CBM Aggregates and Glenn Harrington’s Commitment to Site Rehabilitation

by: CBM Aggregates

Rehabilitation is not usually the first word that comes to mind when considering mining or material extraction‭. ‬However‭, ‬rehabilitation is a significant part of the requirements for aggregate extraction in Ontario‭. ‬

Under the legislative and regulatory environment in Ontario‭, ‬when aggregate companies identify areas for material extraction‭, ‬they are required to include a detailed plan for site rehabilitation after aggregate extraction has taken place‭. ‬Rehabilitation means the restoration of the site to its former use‭, ‬if possible‭, ‬or changing the site to another use or condition that is compatible with the surrounding land‭. ‬

Though minimum standards for rehabilitation exist as part of the provincial requirements and are identified on all licensed pit‭ ‬and quarry site plans in Ontario‭, ‬CBM Aggregates‭ (‬CBM‭) ‬strives to achieve higher-quality rehabilitation‭. ‬Whether by encouraging‭ ‬biodiversity or restoring productive farmland‭, ‬these efforts are geared toward promoting uses that blend with the surrounding landscape‭. ‬

Aggregate companies often face community challenges when a new extraction site is identified‭. ‬Residents typically are unaware of‭ ‬the interim nature of an aggregate operation and the benefits that will be realized when rehabilitation fully occurs‭. ‬In many cases‭, ‬residents don’t even understand restoration efforts are required at all‭. ‬Local communities can be anxious and generally unhappy with the prospect of an extraction site in their neighborhood‭. ‬

History of Cannington Pit‭ ‬

In 1996‭, ‬Cannington Pit received a license to operate through the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry‭ (‬MNRF‭). ‬Sand and gravel extraction began in the late 1990s and the pit operated intermittently‭, ‬supplying material to CBM’s nearby Sunderland Pit and to Brock Township for local road projects‭. ‬In 2020‭, ‬the last truckload of gravel left the pit‭.‬

CBM worked with Glenn Harrington to rehabilitate the site‭. ‬Under his guidance‭, ‬progressive rehabilitation occurred at the pit and uniquely included a number of specific rehabilitated end uses on the property‭, ‬including agriculture‭, ‬open natural habitat‭, ‬reforestation‭, ‬and pond/wetland creation‭.‬

Glenn Harrington‭, ‬was a founding partner and principal landscape architect at Harrington McAvan Ltd‭. ‬For over 40‭ ‬years‭, ‬the firm‭ ‬has specialized in landscape architecture‭, ‬earth sciences‭, ‬and biology‭, ‬with a focus on stream and wetland restoration and rehabilitation projects‭. ‬Over his career‭, ‬Glenn was widely known for his innovative approach to environmental landscape design and his skills as a facilitator in the public participation process‭.‬

Glenn had a knack for respectfully educating objectors about the benefits of site restoration to help companies gain approval for aggregate licenses‭. ‬He treated all people—from municipal and agency staff to the public—with kindness as he represented his clients’‭ ‬positions‭, ‬spreading the value of soil bioengineering and landscape and rehabilitation design‭. ‬By giving respect and providing‭ ‬science-based education‭, ‬he also gained respect from these audiences‭, ‬which typically are hard to win over‭.‬

Restoration work

As an expert in innovative bank stabilization and improvement to aquatic habitat‭, ‬Glenn worked with CBM on many projects including the Cannington Pit‭, ‬located in Brock Township‭, ‬Durham Region‭, ‬Ontario‭.‬

In 2013‭, ‬CBM Aggregates and Glenn Harrington began restoring the Cannington Pit by establishing a wetland plant seed bank along‭ ‬the pond’s northern shoreline‭. ‬By 2015‭, ‬they stocked the pond with minnows‭, ‬and in 2016‭, ‬Glenn led an agricultural rehabilitation project‭, ‬including land contouring‭, ‬soil management‭, ‬and the introduction of rainbow and brown trout‭. ‬In 2017‭, ‬Glenn added a spawning area and planted oak acorns and tallgrass prairie species‭.‬

In the following years‭, ‬CBM and Glenn expanded their efforts‭, ‬building wetland plant boxes‭, ‬planting thousands of trees with Ethics Tree Creations‭, ‬reshaping pond slopes‭, ‬and conducting fisheries assessments‭, ‬which confirmed healthy populations of minnows‭ ‬and trout‭. ‬These projects also included erosion control and creating wildlife habitats‭.‬

The Cannington Pit was close to Glenn’s heart‭. ‬In fact‭, ‬Glenn loved the site so much that he purchased it in 2015‭, ‬dubbing the area‭ ‬“Harrington Glen‭.‬”‭ ‬He planned to spend his retirement there‭, ‬working the fields‭, ‬canoeing‭, ‬fishing‭, ‬rambling‭, ‬and sharing the bounty of his land‭.‬

Unfortunately‭, ‬Glenn passed away before restoration was complete‭, ‬but his commitment to rehabilitation—specifically at the Cannington Pit—will always be remembered‭.‬

The Cannington Pit‭, ‬initially licensed in 1996‭ ‬and operational until 2020‭, ‬received a licence surrender from the MNRF in 2023‭, ‬having met the approved site plans‭.‬

During its operation‭, ‬CBM received multiple awards from the Ontario Stone‭, ‬Sand‭, ‬and Gravel Association‭ (‬OSSGA‭) ‬for their progressive rehabilitation efforts at the Cannington Pit‭.‬

Now surrendered‭, ‬the former pit is now host to thriving agricultural areas‭, ‬naturalized and wetland habitats‭ - ‬a lasting reminder of Glenn’s legacy‭.  ‬

Building a Balanced Workforce: Recruitment and Retention in the Aggregate Industry

It’s time to think outside the box and try something different

by: Kelly Parker

In ‬the corporate world‭, ‬COVID-19‭ ‬altered the fabric of our professional lives‭. ‬A large majority of employees worked from home and‭ ‬were introduced to a new life-work balance that didn’t previously exist in their jobs‭. ‬Working from home highlighted the potential for workplaces to foster a happier‭, ‬more productive‭, ‬and loyal workforce through flexibility‭. ‬Yet‭, ‬this adaptability never really hit the construction industry‭, ‬particularly the‭ ‬aggregate sector‭, ‬where employees cannot do their job remotely‭, ‬and logistical demands are high—often requiring workers to begin at the crack of dawn and work a 12-hour shift‭.  ‬

But this new flexibility is what our workforce is searching for‭. ‬Is achieving work-life balance feasible in an industry where frontline workers often face long hours with minimal time off‭? ‬Not only did the pandemic force companies to explore flexible work‭ ‬options but because it disproportionately affected working women‭, ‬it shed a light on the impact of gender inequality and how companies can reduce barriers for female employees—something the aggregate industry is currently tackling‭. ‬

Recruitment and retention strategies are integral to the labour shortage problems the industry is facing as an aging workforce is retiring‭. ‬How do we solve these problems‭?‬

Training Colleges‭ ‬

One way is to build relationships with training colleges so that you can speak to young workers and help them overcome any misconceptions they may have about the aggregate industry‭.   ‬“We have agreements‭,‬”‭ ‬explains Mike Andrighetti‭, ‬Vice President of Ethier Sand‭ & ‬Gravel‭, ‬“with some of the training colleges here locally where we’re able to monitor and have supervisors attend the training with the employees‭, ‬so we have a relationship with them before they‭ ‬actually start work‭.‬”

“Any operator can go get a job working in construction or anywhere else where the piece of equipment will work‭,‬”‭ ‬continues Andrighetti‭. ‬“But to attract them to quarrying and a pit setting is a lot different‭. ‬It may be a kind of dirty-sounding business‭, ‬but it’s also a lot of fun‭. ‬You have to make it exciting and engaging‭.‬”

Hours of work

One strategy to address this shift is to move away from the traditional 12-hour shift model‭. ‬“You have to schedule your shifts and treat your people in ways that may be a lot different than what the old guard used to do‭,‬”‭ ‬stresses Andrighetti‭. ‬“Especially in the quarry or pit setting‭. ‬Trying different things that are not traditional to the industry‭, ‬like removing the traditional night shift from the equation‭, ‬is something that has worked for us‭. ‬It allows us to have these young people who value time at home and life away from work more than maybe the 30-year employee has‭. ‬I think that’s been a real driver for us‭.‬”

Ethier Sand‭ & ‬Gravel has transitioned from 12-hour rotations to a production day of two eight-hour shifts‭, ‬a change that has yielded positive results‭. ‬However‭, ‬moving to three eight-hour shifts in a 24-hour production day could exacerbate staffing shortages‭. ‬Andrighetti notes‭ ‬that effective recruitment messaging is crucial‭: ‬“If you’re dangling the carrot out there that the worker is going to have more time at home and better work-life balance‭ ‬–‭ ‬which is the point‭ ‬–‭ ‬you’re attracting the group that’s opposed to the 12-hour shifts‭.‬”

The transition period when implementing this strategy may present challenges‭, ‬potentially leaving the company short-staffed until sufficient staffing levels are reached‭. ‬“It’s tough‭. ‬You just have to have the right people who create an environment where‭ (‬new employees‭) ‬will be welcomed‭,‬”‭ ‬Andrighetti explains‭. ‬“And it’s a good place to work‭ ‬–‭ ‬a team environment‭. ‬If you establish all of that‭, ‬then you hope that transition period is easy on the employees and happens fairly quickly‭, ‬obviously for the employer‭.‬”

Andrighetti emphasizes that feedback from employees has been overwhelmingly positive‭, ‬as the changes have fostered the desired work-life balance‭. ‬“Sometimes‭, ‬in certain circumstances‭, ‬you need to accommodate the employees‭. ‬Everyone now‭, ‬especially with this younger group‭, ‬has different needs than employees have had in the past‭. ‬Part of work-life balance is‭ ‬‘Hey‭, ‬my kid’s got a recital today‭,‬’‭ ‬or a medical appointment‭, ‬and that’s something that companies are increasingly trying to accommodate‭.‬”

Balancing Flexibility with Industry Demands

Gone are the days when employees would spend their entire careers with one company‭. ‬Today’s workforce anticipates working for multiple employers and even changing careers‭, ‬further complicating retention efforts‭. ‬Additionally‭, ‬their priorities have shifted from a work-first mentality to a significant emphasis on work-life balance‭.‬

The nature of work in pits and quarries—where teamwork is essential—may not allow for complete flexibility‭, ‬but accommodations can still be made‭. ‬“Employees have to be mindful of where they’re working‭. ‬Some situations may not be ideal to allow for that‭,‬”‭ ‬says Andrighetti‭, ‬“But at the same time‭, ‬if you want to be able to say‭ ‬‘Okay‭, ‬you do have a life outside of work and you can go to your kid’s recital‭,‬’‭ ‬you have to be somewhat accommodating‭, ‬and planning ahead certainly helps‭.‬”

In line with the increased focus on work-life balance‭, ‬companies are also enhancing services to support employees’‭ ‬overall mental health‭. ‬“We offer employees a pretty robust employee assistance program‭,‬”‭ ‬Andrighetti explains‭. ‬“It gives all employees access to doctors‭, ‬legal advice‭, ‬counseling‭, ‬and rehab if they need it‭. ‬It’s a pretty comprehensive group of resources that these employees can access and get the help they need at any time with a phone‭ ‬call‭.‬”

Attracting new people to the aggregate industry

Despite the presence of many women in the aggregate industry‭, ‬they remain significantly outnumbered by men‭, ‬a disparity that presents additional challenges‭. ‬Lisa Laronde‭, ‬President of RSG International and Powell Contracting‭, ‬identifies harassment‭, ‬discrimination‭, ‬and isolation as primary obstacles‭. ‬“We do a really good job of getting women trained to be able to get into the trades‭, ‬but then they get on a job site and they’re the only woman there‭. ‬They’re not prepared for that‭. ‬It would be nice if we could at least prepare women‭, ‬saying‭ ‬‘this is the environment you’re going to enter into‭,‬’‭ ‬versus pretending it doesn’t exist‭. ‬We need strategies on how to deal with that‭.‬”

Childcare is another significant barrier for women in construction‭. ‬“We don’t have nine-to-five hours‭. ‬You have to be able to get to work early‭, ‬sometimes before childcare is open‭. ‬As part of the North American Women in Construction and the Canadian representative for the Global Women in Construction panel‭, ‬I can say this is a global issue‭,‬”‭ ‬says Laronde‭. ‬Access to clean washrooms and feminine hygiene products is also a critical concern‭.‬

To address these issues‭, ‬Laronde’s firms established a Diversity‭, ‬Equity‭, ‬and Inclusion‭ (‬DEI‭) ‬Committee‭, ‬which focuses on creating a more accommodating work environment‭. ‬“Women need clean access to washrooms‭, ‬which is important for everyone‭. ‬One of the first things we did was to have an all-gender‭ ‬washroom or a gender-neutral washroom‭. ‬Construction is reportedly the number one job for transgender men‭, ‬so everyone needs a safe place to go to the washroom‭. ‬It was a huge eye-opening experience for me‭. ‬I thought I was well aware‭, ‬but I realized I come from a place of privilege‭. ‬It’s important to speak not only for women but for other underrepresented ethnicities in our industry‭.‬”

Additionally‭, ‬the firm introduced a‭ ‬“quiet room‭.‬”‭ ‬“That allows you‭, ‬if you’re nursing‭, ‬a private place to pump breast milk or just a space for alone time if you need to gather your thoughts‭. ‬It’s also used for prayer as we found some people were praying in bathrooms‭, ‬which is not a nice place to be‭.‬”

As the aggregate industry grapples with a labour shortage‭, ‬it is crucial to consider these details‭. ‬“Women represent 50%‭ ‬of the population but only 5%‭ ‬of the skilled trades‭. ‬It’s crazy that we’re not attracting more women‭. ‬If industry‭, ‬unions‭, ‬education‭, ‬and government come together‭, ‬we can attract more women‭, ‬Indigenous people‭, ‬and new immigrants into the construction industry‭. ‬These are all opportunities for us to be successful‭,‬”‭ ‬emphasizes Laronde‭.‬

It’s clear that introducing work-life balance practices‭, ‬as well as ensuring your recruitment practices are attracting the full scope of potential employees will help solve these issues‭.‬

Andrighetti agrees‭, ‬and concludes by providing the following advice‭:  ‬“Don’t be afraid to just think outside the box and try something different‭. ‬It’s a pretty traditional industry that needs to think a little differently about how it wants to treat its employees‭.‬”

Building Ontario: The Critical Role of Stone, Sand and Gravel

Is Ontario’s ambitious infrastructure plan at risk due to a looming shortage of high-quality licenced aggregates‭?‬

by: Matt Bradford

Ontario has ambitious infrastructure plans in the coming years‭. ‬From adding 1.5‭ ‬million new homes to building critical healthcare‭ ‬facilities‭, ‬laying stretches of road to conducting extensive below-ground works‭, ‬the Province’s pipeline is reaching capacity‭. ‬Each project has the potential to impact the lives of Ontarians‭, ‬but without access to high-quality stone‭, ‬sand‭, ‬and gravel‭, ‬one wonders how they will make it off the ground‭.  ‬

“The simple story is that we are running out of high-quality licenced aggregate‭,‬”‭ ‬says Mike McSweeney‭, ‬OSSGA Executive Director‭, ‬citing research that indicates nearly four billion tonnes of aggregate will be needed to cover the Government of Ontario’s ambitious infrastructure plans—which the Province aims to hit by 2040‭. ‬That’s no small order‭, ‬McSweeney continues‭, ‬and for the aggregate industry to even come close‭, ‬it needs to be able to dig‭: ‬“And that shouldn’t be a problem‭, ‬right‭? ‬All it means is finding good supply‭, ‬setting up operations‭, ‬and starting to dig‭. ‬And yet‭, ‬it’s much more complicated than that these days‭.‬”

Indeed‭, ‬between extended licensing timelines‭, ‬ballooning costs‭, ‬political barriers‭, ‬and the delays that come with addressing public misconceptions‭, ‬the process of putting shovels in the ground is not as straightforward as it could be‭. ‬And at the heart of the issue‭, ‬says McSweeney‭, ‬is a gap in public understanding‭: ‬“Nothing gets built without stone‭, ‬sand‭, ‬and gravel‭,‬”‭ ‬he adds‭. ‬“But we’re having a lot of difficulty doing what we need to do as an industry because of that lack of understanding and the barriers that come with it‭.‬”

Hurdles at high levels

It is no exaggeration to say the aggregate industry is one of the most regulated industries in Canada‭. ‬The industry is beholden‭ ‬to 25‭ ‬pieces of legislation and countless regulations‭. ‬All may have started with good intent but are nonetheless making it increasingly difficult to get pits and quarries up and running in places where they can produce high-quality‭, ‬close-to-market aggregate‭. ‬

This all goes back to a lack of understanding and appreciation‭, ‬says McSweeney‭, ‬who adds‭, ‬“It just doesn’t seem like the people who depend on aggregate but also regulate and legislate have a sufficient understanding of how important‭ ‬it is to their communities or our society as a whole‭.‬”

There are ample examples of current policies prohibiting much-needed aggregate operations‭. ‬For example‭, ‬Neal DeRuyter‭, ‬Partner with MHBC Planning‭, ‬says the current policies prohibiting new aggregate extraction sites within the Province’s Natural Heritage System have created significant barriers to being able to set up operations in proximity to high-quality aggregates‭. ‬“I’m often asked‭, ‬what’s one policy that you think should be changed that would help overall aggregate supply‭, ‬and it’s removing that prohibition on new aggregate operations within the natural Heritage system‭,‬”‭ ‬he says‭, ‬noting‭, ‬“Fortunately‭, ‬the province has recently announced the approval of the Provincial Planning Statement coming into effect in October‭ ‬2024‭ ‬which does just that‭.‬”

Further hurdles can be found at the municipal level‭. ‬Local governments are increasingly hesitant to approve pit and quarry operations‭, ‬even when Ontario’s provincial policy statement encourages municipalities to provide opportunities for aggregates to be located close to the markets where they’re in demand‭. ‬

“There are several municipalities that don’t like the idea of having a pit or quarry in their borders because they believe it’s going to negatively impact their communities‭, ‬and that sentiment seems to get elevated the closer you get to Toronto‭,‬”‭ ‬says DeRuyter‭. ‬“They may have good deposits‭, ‬but they’re close to communities and housing‭, ‬so they’re conflicted about giving the okay‭.‬”‭ ‬

All told‭, ‬aggregate industry players face a number of barriers to supplying Ontario with the materials it needs to move ahead with its infrastructure plans‭. ‬In addition to causing friction on the balance sheet‭, ‬these obstacles are extending the licensing process to unsustainable lengths‭. ‬

Waiting decades to dig

The timeline between applying for a pit or quarry licence and starting operations stretches by the day‭. ‬Where it may have taken‭ ‬two to four years to obtain a licence 25‭ ‬years ago‭, ‬today’s timelines are nudging north of a decade‭. ‬To understand why the process is taking longer‭, ‬it helps to have a refresher on the licensing process‭. ‬

Essentially‭, ‬getting approvals for pits or quarries requires obtaining a licence through the province via the‭ ‬Aggregate Resources Act‭ ‬and then approval through the host municipality‭. ‬The licence application process begins by identifying a potential site and then pairing with third-party consultants to conduct technical studies to address a broad range of matters‭ (‬e.g‭., ‬environmental impact‭, ‬noise‭, ‬traffic‭, ‬etc‭.). ‬These studies can vary depending on several factors‭; ‬for example‭, ‬if the application is for a pit or quarry‭, ‬if the site is above or below water levels‭, ‬if it’s Class A or B‭, ‬and so on‭. ‬

“Usually‭, ‬you need to set aside 12‭ ‬to 18‭ ‬months to do the studies‭,‬”‭ ‬offers Matt Bertram‭, ‬Senior Project Engineer with Skelton‭, ‬Brumwell‭ & ‬Associates Inc‭.  ‬“So‭, ‬more often than not‭, ‬by the time you have everything bundled up and ready to go you’re probably in that 18‭ ‬to 24-month window before you even can make your application to begin with‭.‬”

Next in the process is packing the studies into an application and sending it to the Ministry of Natural Resources‭ (‬MNR‭), ‬which‭ ‬has a legislated timeline to review the application’s completeness‭. ‬Applicants that receive the greenlight then move on to the notification and consultation stage‭, ‬which involves notifying all landowners within 120‭ ‬meters of the proposed site as well as the local municipality‭, ‬the Ministry of Environment‭, ‬and a host of other stakeholders‭. ‬

In addition are Indigenous Communities that must be engaged and consulted on for many proposed aggregate operations‭. ‬This is a vital step to ensure plans address Indigenous communities’‭ ‬concerns and align with their interests and values‭; ‬however‭, ‬with no hard and fast timelines to go by‭, ‬these consultations can‭ ‬add significant time to the licensing journey‭. ‬

“The process is open-ended‭, ‬and you often don’t know what you’re getting into‭,‬”‭ ‬says Bertram‭. ‬“You can be dealing with several communities with different and contradictory interests‭, ‬so you really need to put aside the time‭ ‬and resources to help find a middle ground that makes everyone happy‭.‬”

DeRuyter agrees that this component of the consultation process is key but that it can be onerous for all parties‭. ‬That includes‭ ‬Indigenous Community leaders themselves‭, ‬who may be stretched thin consulting with organizations in any number of sectors at the same time‭: ‬“Indigenous Communities are asked to review and comment on tons of things‭, ‬not just aggregate‭. ‬They have capacity issues‭, ‬so it just takes time‭.‬”

Consultations can be tricky‭, ‬no matter who the parties are‭. ‬To move in the licensing process‭, ‬applicants must prove they’ve done everything they can to engage stakeholders and address their concerns‭. ‬Here again‭, ‬says DeRuyter‭, ‬this means dealing with many moving targets‭: ‬“If you talk to aggregate producers‭, ‬one of the most difficult things for them is that they don’t know where the finish line is‭.‬”

After the consultation phase comes a 60-day notification period‭, ‬during which time efforts are stepped up to inform the public through local media advertising‭, ‬signage‭, ‬and public meetings‭. ‬At the end of those 60‭ ‬days‭, ‬licence applicants have two years to‭ ‬work through any comments and see if they can resolve them or not‭.‬

And surely‭, ‬says Bertram‭, ‬“You’re always going to have opposition‭, ‬no matter what‭. ‬It’s a given‭. ‬That’s why good community relations and early engagement go a long way at the end of the day‭.‬”

When the applicant is confident it has dealt with the feedback from the 60-day notification period‭, ‬the application process is sent back to the MNR for final approval‭. ‬But while one would assume this is the final stop before getting the green light‭, ‬more often than not the application is deferred to the Ontario Land Tribal‭. ‬

Enter‭: ‬the OLT

These days‭, ‬it can seem as though all licensing roads lead to the OLT‭. ‬This isn’t far off from the truth‭, ‬and it’s increasingly the result of politics getting in the way‭. ‬

At issue is the fact that even when license applications engage in success consultations—and even though the provincial licence statement may favour close-to-market aggregates—municipalities tend to defer their approval in response to public opposition‭. ‬

“What you’ll typically see now is that municipal council will vote against their staff recommendation and against the Provincial Policy Statement because they want to say to their constituents‭, ‬‘I voted against it‭, ‬I protected you‭,‬’”‭ ‬says McSweeney‭. ‬“I haven’t found a politician yet who doesn’t support aggregate‭, ‬but they won’t vote for it openly because they fear it will cost them their seat‭, ‬and they know the Ontario Land Tribunal will likely approve‭ ‬the licence anyways‭.‬”

The OLT has played an important role in the licensing process for nearly a half-century under various names‭ (‬e.g‭., ‬the Ontario Municipal Board‭). ‬Under the‭ ‬Aggregate Resources Act and the Planning Act‭, ‬it has the authority to deal with any disputes and objections relating to licence applications and municipal approvals for pits and quarries‭. ‬

“Often‭, ‬producers need to appeal to the OLT either because the council has refused the application or they haven’t made a decision on the application‭, ‬and so the OLT then deals with the application and makes the decision‭,‬”‭ ‬explains Kim Mullin‭, ‬Partner with Wood Bull LLP and OSSGA board member‭.‬

Mullin has practiced extensively before the OLT and represented many aggregate producers on their licence applications‭. ‬Considering this part of the process requires more time and resources‭, ‬it pays to go in prepared‭: ‬

“My advice is to make sure you’re working with a good consulting team and that you’re preparing the application and all the studies with a view towards how well they’ll play in front of the Ontario Land Tribunal if we end up going there‭.‬”‭ ‬

Digging ahead

For Ontario’s infrastructure plans to materialize‭, ‬it will need aggregate producers who have the ability to deliver the goods‭. ‬There is reason to be encouraged by the Province’s moves to support close-to-market operation‭, ‬as there is confidence in the aggregate industry’s ability to address the public perceptions holding them back‭. ‬

As DeRuyter notes‭: ‬“A lot of aggregate producers do a very good job at‭ ‬building good relationships with the public because‭, ‬at the end of the day‭, ‬they are members of the community‭. ‬They want to employ local people‭, ‬help build the community through their business‭, ‬and do their best to be good neighbours‭.‬”

Moving ahead‭, ‬there are hopes that efforts to continue fostering relationships with the public and provincial decision-makers will bring licensing process times under control and‭, ‬more importantly‭, ‬let aggregate producers get to work‭. ‬

Love thy neighbour

Taking a pro-active approach to developing good relations with nearby residents is essential and reaps multiple rewards.

by Kelly Parker

Generally speaking, laypersons have a good grasp on the temporary inconveniences and noise involved in the expansion of housing in their neighbourhood, or in the construction of a building. But the notion of a pit or quarry nearby tends to bring out the NIMBY in people – the “Not in My Backyard” mindset.

That’s why working on good neighbour and community relations can go such a long way toward ensuring the smooth operation of an aggregate site. It’s about maintaining positive relations while simultaneously countering misconceptions, educating those who are leery, and enhancing a company’s reputation as an asset to the community.

For many, the first image that comes to mind when learning that a quarry will be operating nearby is a big, ugly hole forever replacing the present beautiful wilderness. Of course, that’s unavoidably going to be the case for a short time, but it needs to be communicated that it is just one part of an evolving process that ends with a complete site rehabilitation.

“Part of your plan for every site is your final rehab plan,” explains Cindy McCarthy, manager of transportation and compliance for Miller Aggregates. “A lot of those sites are turned back to agriculture, or become a water feature like a small lake, and might eventually be surrounded by residential homes. If we’re here for 50 or 100 years, I know it feels like a long-term use, but your children or grandchildren might be buying a house on a little Miller Lake.”

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

Also important at the outset is engagement with Indigenous communities, stresses Chris Breen, vice president of government and community relations at Walker Aggregates. Breen notes that his firm will reach out and set up agreements with Indigenous groups to fund their participation. On-site, they’ll walk the land together and set up an archaeological monitoring program to determine if there is anything that is culturally significant on that land, and in turn that process may help in their efforts to trace their history.

With an eye to the future, notes Breen, “we gain a lot of help from (Indigenous) communities with their traditional knowledge of the land, which comes in handy with quarry rehabilitation plans. At one point when the quarry is mined out, you want to return it to nature, and [you want to have] somebody who understands that land, who understands the features of the land, what grows well, what are the truly native crops, and how the wildlife likes to interact with that land. That’s an area that’s absolutely critical to not just Walker, but our industry in general.”

Neighbours rightly have concerns about how the daily operations of a quarry will affect them, both aesthetically and practically. Those reasonable issues can be addressed in a number of ways. McCarthy notes that Miller surrounds its quarries with earthen berms and tree blinds to conceal operations as much as possible.

Unfortunately, however, there can be a downside to this approach. “People then get an idea that we’re trying to hide something behind our berms,” she says. “So we open the gate and invite people in to come on in to see what’s going on, and we’ll explain our processes. 

McCarthy emphasizes that an open-door policy at its quarries is key and constant. “Anytime someone wants to come in this door and have a tour of the quarry to see what we’re doing, we’ll have the operations manager and a site superintendent pop them into the truck, drive them around, and just show them what’s going on here,” she says.

Walker has a similar policy, and also hosts community gatherings on-site. “We’ll do a summer barbecue and a holiday gathering each year,” explains Breen. “These are opportunities for people to just show up at the quarry. The summer one in particular is quite popular because we’re at full operation and people can actually see quarry activities. The kids like to come and touch the truck and all that kind of stuff, and then we’ll do a barbecue lunch. It’s a good opportunity for people to be able to ask any questions very informally, and to give any feedback that they want.”

Breen says those events are supplemented by regular newsletters and other targeted communication, both through direct mail and occasional advertising in local media when there’s anything new happening at the quarry.

The robust communication can also help to illustrate how local aggregate operations can benefit the community. “Sometimes people forget or underestimate the importance of having a local aggregate source close to construction sites,” notes Breen, adding that a local quarry can point out the advantages of close-to-market aggregate versus trucking it in from a distance. “They sort of say, ‘Yeah, I get it.’ We don’t need higher costs of anything these days and we all need to do a better job with taking care of the environment.”

McCarthy is adamant that any aggregate firm going into a new community should make setting up a public engagement committee their first priority. “That’s really going to give you traction because you make yourself transparent and it gives you a conduit to the community,” she says. “People who are concerned can talk to that committee, and I think it really makes a difference.”

“Our neighbours understand the importance of quarries for building housing, schools, hospitals and roads,” adds Breen. “They also understand that having a quarry in their neighbourhood means that they are making an extra contribution, that they’re really stepping up with their neighbourhood to help build our communities. It’s critical for us then to be in touch with them proactively all the time, to keep the lines of communication open and support initiatives that are important to them.”

 

DAY-TO-DAY OPERATION 

Regarding the day-to-day operation of the quarry itself, and any inconvenience it may cause neighbours, dust mitigation tends to be a priority. Miller recently purchased a piece of equipment that atomizes mist to capture and drop dust. It also employs a full-time

employee whose only job is to drive a water truck around the quarry and up and down the road outside the gate to suppress dust. Miller also spreads a layer of calcium chloride a couple of times a year for the same reason.

Many, if not all facilities have extensive traffic studies attached to them as part of the licensing process, because this too can have an impact on nearby residents. “Those [studies] make sure that we pick the best route to support the heavy trucks that are coming in and out of a quarry,” says Breen. “That includes traffic rules and a lot of signage to remind the drivers what those rules are. We have a 25-kmper- hour limit inside our quarries to keep things safe and to keep dust down. We also employ retired police to help us enforce and monitor safety to make sure that the roads leading in and out of the quarry are safe for everybody in the community.”

The same berms that improve the view for quarry neighbours also help with noise, directing it upward instead of outward. Walker also puts rubber linings in its equipment to soften the noise when rock gets dropped into big containers on the back of trucks. It covers a lot of its stationary equipment and installs insulation inside to dampen the sound.

“Another thing that we do,” says Breen, “is when we have to blast, we only do that at midday, so no one’s in bed asleep, or at night when they’re home trying to have their dinner. We do it at midday because that seems to be the best time for folks and has the least impact on their day. Some people also like to get a phone call or a text before a blast just to remind them it’s going to happen, which we’ll do.” Walker also foregoes blasting on windy days to control dust.

 

GIVING BACK

As with any business – but particularly in an aggregate operation that might experience more community resistance – community involvement is of paramount importance, and both Miller and Walker try to lead in that arena. They financially support community activities, sports leagues and charities, and they get their boots on the ground in the community whenever possible.

Miller sponsors a local soccer team every year with the Miller name on the players’ uniform, and it is front and centre at an event the league holds each season for sponsors. “One of the ladies here at the office made up a table,” details McCarthy, “took some of our products there to show, had a few little contests and a few little activities, and we just made sure we were there.”

Prior to the pandemic, the local historical society would hold a big annual event; Miller was present there as well. “We’d bring the old Miller truck and have a couple of people there to talk about it to show it off,” says McCarthy. “It’s that next step-up to engagement, as opposed to just financially supporting these things.”

McCarthy points to a recent tree planting day as another example of Miller’s efforts in the community. “I think we did about 300 [trees] that day,” she recalls. “These opportunities show that we are doing the right thing for the environment. Bringing out the community to help and be with us made it a good day.”

Walker Aggregates too is heavily involved in community initiatives and charities. “Habitat for Humanity is a big one for us, so we donate both employee time and building materials,” notes Breen. “I think we worked on six different builds in Niagara, Grey and Bruce counties in 2023, and that was done by allowing employees time to go and actually do the construction, and also through donations of aggregate and other related materials to the projects. 

The company gives every employee two paid days off a year to volunteer in the community, in whatever way appeals to them. Giving them this flexibility lets every Walker employee consider how best they can help and interact with the people living in region. “They can do pretty much whatever they want. That’s good because it gets the ball rolling, gets people focused, gets people thinking about where they want to do their volunteerism, and many of the employees then end up offering more of their own time to that organization,” Breen says.

By engaging in all of these efforts, stresses Breen, “these folks become our best advocates. Nothing says that we’re doing a good job with what we’re doing like a happy neighbour. We can say what we want, as much as we want, but when a happy neighbour is expressing that, it’s a really good indication for us that we’re doing the right thing.”

Perhaps trumping the desire to be a good neighbour and responsible corporate citizen is the fact that the people who work at the quarries are often community members themselves. “We’re neighbours. We’re people who’ve been born and raised here, too,” says McCarthy. “We’re just trying to make a living and do it in the most professional, most environmentally friendly way that we can, because we care about this stuff too, just like they do.”

Minnows and memories

CBM Aggregates’ McMillan Pond hosts kids and cops for an unforgettable day of fishing

Do you remember catching your very first fish? If you grew up in Ontario, with its wealth of unspoiled freshwater lakes and rivers, chances are you’ve never forgotten the excitement of that tug on the line and the thrill of pulling a sparkling silver fish out of the water.

In 2023, CBM Aggregates hosted a “Kids and Cops” event that gave a group of children that same wonderful opportunity. The event paired children who might otherwise never experience fishing with police officers in a fun day at the rehabilitated McMillan Pond near Aberfoyle. The experience was made possible by the Fishing Forever Foundation, which supports the program whose aim is to open minds and build bridges.

“The McMillan site is a restored gravel pit in the Township of Puslinch, 15 or 20 minutes south of Guelph,” says Steve May, lands manager for CBM Aggregates. “It operated as a tip for approximately 10 years and was restored to a natural condition starting in 2002.” Naturalization contouring on the property, which is just under 100 acres, with a 65-acre lake, was completed in 2007. “At that particular area there's very high-quality aggregate material located below the water table,” says May.

Once extraction was complete, the lake on the site was clean and clear but utterly bereft of life. After May joined the company about five years ago, new technology with floating raceways allowed CBM to put a controlled amount of nutrient into the pond. Essentially, May says, the system works via a network of docks that enclose the fish with screens on both sides. “Water is fed through on an airlift system and there’s an airstone, like what you would have in an aquarium system.”

Rainbow trout are the focal species, but CBM also stocks bluegills, which are a sunfish-type species, and some native minnows, and they have all flourished in the lake. Besides fish species, the pond has attracted numerous birds, including a pair of bald eagles, blue herons, common terns, diving ducks, osprey and a family of loons. In addition, the pond hosts turtles, frogs, salamanders and crayfish that have migrated on their own from the surrounding area. The dissolved fish waste used to encourage the rehabilitation process in the lake was sourced from Izumi Aquaculture, Inc., which also opened a fish production facility on the property.

 The company’s president Wayne Izumi founded the “Kids and Cops” program with his brother Bob, who is well known as a professional angler and long-time host of Bob Izumi's Real Fishing Show. “My brother and I started the Fishing Forever Foundation over 25 years ago, and for at least 20 years we’ve supported a ‘Kids and Cops’ program,” Wayne says. “We wanted to put some of our money back into supporting fishing.”

Creating connection

Multiple “Kids and Cops” events take place in different locations each year. “In our peak years, before COVID, we had up to 80 events a year – mainly in Ontario, but also in Saskatchewan,” says Izumi. The program was designed to create a community connection between youth and local law enforcement. All the equipment is normally provided to the young participants, and they receive some basic instruction in fishing techniques.

Holding the event at McMillan Pond was a natural idea because Izumi Aquaculture already had a presence there. “We produce steelhead trout for market consumption, and we are also vertically integrated from egg to plate, so we also have a hatchery,” Izumi says. “We go right from eggs to fingerlings to mature fish for market. We have stocking programs; we sell fish for stocking private ponds.”

The event paired Guelph Police Service officers with youth from the Brant Avenue Neighborhood Group. It was not the first time Guelph Police were involved. “We've been doing this since 2012,” says Inspector David Doxey, who works with the Neighbourhood Services Division of the Guelph Police Service. “It had always been a hobby of mine, and still is. I always enjoyed it. We work with kids who wouldn’t normally have the opportunity to enjoy a day of fishing. We always reach out to the youth centres or the neighbourhood groups that work with children.”

Besides simply creating an enjoyable day for all involved, pairing police officers with neighbourhood children has many potential benefits for both the participants and their community. “All the studies say that fishing is one of the best activities for a kid because it’s one of the few activities where a kid can outperform an adult,” Doxey says. “Some of the kids who come out to that event can really use that. The expression on their faces and that sense of achievement make the entire event worthwhile.”

In addition, connecting with police in a relaxed and happy way may be something that stays with a child for a long time afterwards, potentially bringing about positive changes for them, their families and the broader community. “It’s an event where cops and kids can bond together and just create a good relationship,” says Doxey. “This year we reached out to the Brant Avenue Neighbourhood Group. We had about 20 youth, and their parents came with them. Having that opportunity to mentor them allows the police service to increase that commitment to enhancing the quality of life while contributing to the positive growth of the community.”

New experiences

It’s especially impactful, adds Izumi, for new Canadians. “This is increasingly important for new immigrants because many have had no exposure to sport fishing and some of them are coming from cultures where the sight of someone in uniform is a scary thing,” he says. “The reward is the smiles we see on their faces and the pride in being able to enhance the quality of their life.” Then there’s the fun of the sport. “At McMillan I think 80 per cent of them caught their very first fish, while 100 per cent of them caught fish,” Izumi says.

“I think every one of them caught at least a dozen fish,” adds May. “The bluegills were very accommodating. We fed them hamburgers and sausages, and it was about as good a day as you could get – sunny with a light breeze and about 20 degrees. It was a perfect day all around.”

“It was really interesting to see young girls from Syria,” continues May. “I can't imagine the changes they’ve experienced. To be out there and to see the smiles on their faces when they're in a pretty environment and catching the fish, and then to have the stars align, to have the fish cooperating – the fishing was something that even very experienced fishermen would have appreciated.”

The police officers who helped out were keen anglers and they were very helpful, but the event would not have been possible without CBM Aggregates having successfully rehabilitated the pond and surrounding land. The work and effort to make this possible was appreciated by all involved. “It's really nice to see a corporate partner taking the steps they take to rehabilitate and populate a piece of land as they have, restoring it to a productive part of the ecosystem,” May says. “[It shows a] commitment to the community and a commitment to the environment.

For CBM, it proved an excellent opportunity to showcase the immense possibilities that exist with the successful rehabilitation of a former pit or quarry, while simultaneously doing something good for young people who might otherwise never have the opportunity to learn to fish. “It really helps with our business sustainability, and we like to support local communities and local initiatives,” says May, adding that CBM is already planning to repeat the event in 2024.

Powerfully Built

To meet its ambitious infrastructure goals, Ontario needs a strong aggregate industry

by: Matthew Bradford

Shovels are in the ground across Ontario as work proceeds on critical infrastructure projects.

Whether the goal is to improve transportation, build healthcare capacity, or relieve the housing crunch, every solution involves aggregate – or sand, stone and gravel.

“Nothing gets built without aggregate,” says Mike McSweeney, OSSGA’s executive director. “That applies to everything – transportation lines, schools, hospitals, recreational facilities, and all our public and private buildings. Stone, sand and gravel play a central role in developing all that.”

In Ontario, it is estimated that nearly 164 million tonnes of aggregate are consumed annually to keep pace with the province’s infrastructure needs. The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) alone uses 73 million tonnes of that share, and the province is projected to consume another four billion tonnes of aggregate by 2041 as growth continues across the province.

“Federal and provincial governments are in an unprecedented time of investments into infrastructure, and much of that infrastructure will be built in municipalities,” McSweeney reports. “We have three levels of government commitment to a number of projects up and down Ontario, and they’re all going to be coming to the aggregate industry for materials.”

Much of that infrastructure is being built to meet the needs of a large influx of immigrants to the country. Canada is aiming to welcome half a million immigrants annually in the coming years, and many of them are expected to settle in Ontario, one of the country’s most popular destinations. In the first half of 2023, the province attracted 101,455 new permanent residents – around 38.5 per cent of the total for Canada (immigration.ca). The numbers are expected to be just as high for the second half of the year.

 

FOUNDATIONAL RESOURCE

There’s no overstating the importance of aggregates in building up the province’s cities and municipalities to accommodate this mass influx of new residents. Aggregates, after all, are crucial to the growth and evolution of any growing society. Indeed, as Kevin Powers, managing principal at Project Advocacy Inc., aptly states, “Building stone has been the foundation of civilized infrastructure since the time of the pharaohs, alongside a steady supply of clean water and arable land. The same thing can be said today, where nearby stone, sand and gravel supplies are responsible for building Toronto and the GTHA.”

While they are no longer being used to craft mud brick houses, aggregate materials remain foundational for our built environment. Today, high-quality sand, stone and gravel are increasingly in high demand across all construction sectors, particularly among residential builders working to alleviate the country’s housing crunch.

“We have a housing crisis upon us right now, and it’s telling us that we need to build a million-and-a-half new homes in the next 10 years,” says Greg Sweetnam, executive vice president of James Dick Construction Limited.

That’s a lot of houses, Sweetnam continues, and reaching this goal will require nearly 190 million tonnes of aggregate a year, not to mention the additional materials needed to build supporting residential infrastructure. “When you build a residential development, you’re not just building houses; you’re building the streets, the sidewalks, the curbs, the gutters, the storm sewers, the sanitary sewers, the water mains, and the water systems that go with that, as well as any upgrades of any required wastewater treatment plants and stormwater management ponds and water filtration plants,” Sweetnam says.

SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Expansions to Ontario’s healthcare and education systems are contributing to aggregate demand. The province committed to building over 30 hospitals and 300 long-term care homes between 2016 and 2025 and earmarked $208 million between 2023-24 to support critical upgrades and repairs at 131 hospitals and 58 community healthcare facilities.

Ontario is also slated to spend $15 billion over 10 years for new school construction, with hopes of accelerating their development. In a December 2023 statement to the press, Ontario Education Minister Stephen Lecce noted: “Our government is taking new measures to ensure school boards are building schools in nearly half the amount of time it took before – cutting down the timelines by nearly 50 per cent through a transparent, accountable and clear process that prioritizes shovel-ready projects… [so] that we get schools built faster for Ontario families, and for the children of this province too.”

Ambitious plans for Ontario’s transportation infrastructure are also playing a part in straining current and future aggregate supplies. Specifically, the province is spending $25.1 billion over the next decade to enhance the way its people and goods move. Major projects include creating Highway 413, expanding Highway 401, building the Bradford Bypass, and rehabilitating the QEW Garden City Skyway, among other key initiatives. 

“Ontario is the economic engine of Canada, and we produce a lot of goods that need to be moved, and if they don’t go by rail, they go by trucks. Therefore, they need that road infrastructure,” insists McSweeney.

With these and other developments planned across Ontario’s residential, industrial and commercial sectors, one can see why aggregate producers are in high demand. With more initiatives getting the green-light each year, industry stakeholders like Sweetnam hope decision-makers recognize the importance of enabling access to high-quality aggregate materials. After all, he says, “Every time you approve development, you’re actually approving aggregate. Municipalities don’t often think about that. A lot of times they approve all this development, and aggregates are an afterthought. That leaves aggregate producers to figure out how to get the pits and quarries licensed to meet demand.”

 

SHRINKING SUPPLY

Aggregate has an undeniable and irreplaceable role in building Ontario. The question is if aggregate producers have what they need to keep pace. The answer, says Powers, is uncertain: “We’ve been lucky to have sources of high-quality limestone within 50 kilometres of the GTHA since its inception, but that abundance is rapidly coming to an end. More than 90 per cent of our existing limestone deposits in the GTHA have been sterilized by development, regulations or zoning, and the roads, condos and office towers that are being built right now are being supplied by quarries that were approved decades ago or nearly depleted.”

Moreover, Powers adds, the little remaining limestone in proximity to the GTHA that has not been excavated or sterilized is under threat by regulation, by NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) opposition, and other barriers: “This dwindling supply of close-to-market aggregate for a big stumbling block for the province’s transportation targets, for its housing targets, and its environmental targets.”

This issue is documented in The Long Haul: Examining the Implications of Far-from-Market Aggregates, a study commissioned by the Ontario Stone, Sand and Gravel Association (OSSGA) and prepared by the Ontario Chamber of Commerce (OCC). It raises concerns over the depletion of limestone quarries in close proximity to the GTHA. With supplies running out and fewer close-to-market operations coming online, the study predicts the region will become an “aggregate desert” within the next two years, leaving no other option than to bring in materials from over 150 kilometres away.

 “The abundant supply of high-quality aggregate is rapidly coming to an end, and within the next decade, nearby supply is headed off a cliff with far-reaching implications for city building,” says Powers. “That’s largely because the number of pits and quarries data cited in the GTHA continues to drop while the population continues to climb. And if no quarries are licensed in the GTHA in the next 10 years, close-to- market supply of stone, sand and gravel will disappear.”

CLOSE-TO-MARKET

While mining activity in Ontario’s North bodes well for the province’s economy, to make good on its infrastructure plans, many believe that closer-to-market aggregate supplies are vital. There are several reasons why mitigating the long haul of sand, stone and gravel makes sense. For one, says Powers, it is easier on the bottom line. “Transportation is the single biggest expense in aggregate production, absorbing up to 60 per cent of the cost. The farther it’s produced from the market where it’s consumed, the more expensive it becomes,” he says.

Naturally, adds McSweeney, reducing transportation requirements also has environmental benefits: “Yes, we can bring aggregate from North Bay or Parry Sound to Ontario’s waterfront, but think of how much greenhouse gas is being produced by all that transportation, not to mention the wear and tear it’s having on our roads and highways. I always say that if you believe getting your food close to home is a sustainable way of life, then you should believe in getting your construction material as close to home as well.”

There are logistical, financial and environmental advantages to supporting close-to-market aggregate production. Moreover, says Sweetnam, there is enough unlicensed rock resource in southern Ontario to supply regional developments for years to come. The key, he continues, is to convince decision makers to allow the industry to license these strategic, provincially significant resources. This often means convincing politicians and parts of the population that having a pit or quarry close to where they live is a benefit, not a disturbance.  

“Pits and quarries can operate in close harmony with their communities and the environment without conflict,” explains Sweetnam. “Look at the Town of Caledon, where we have the bulk of our operations. Despite the fact that it’s a major aggregate producer and one of the largest concentrations of aggregate sites in Canada, Caledon was just voted the ‘Happiest Community in Canada’ and residents’ property values have doubled in the last few years…. What more do you want as proof that aggregate extraction in close-to-market locations does not have a negative impact on people?”

For now, the barriers to getting more pits and quarries online near the GTHA continue to be NIMBYism and red tape – both of which require ongoing public education and political support. Until then, there is an opportunity for recycled aggregates to help fill the supply need. “Recycled aggregates make up a small fraction of the amount of aggregate, and many municipalities have complete bans on using recycled aggregates because it is not as strong,” says Powers. “Still, recycled aggregate has a lot of basic uses and can be of help right now.”

There is no overstating the role aggregates play in building and maintaining our modern way of life. As Ontario continues to approve developments that will spur growth and accommodate its growing population, access to high-quality sand, stone and gravel materials will be essential.

As Powers observes, “If you believe in this province, and you believe that roads are the lifeblood of its economic prosperity, and that affordable housing, quality healthcare and strong education are the foundation of the Canadian dream, then you need to support the aggregate industry and its push for new quarry development.”

Setting a High Standard

Because not all aggregate is equal, quality control is a key part of the production process

by: Matthew Bradford

There are no guarantees that what’s pulled from the ground is ready for use at building sites. That’s why Ontario’s aggregate producers and suppliers undergo a rigorous quality control process that confirms they’re supplying first-rate materials.  

“You don’t get what you expect. You get when you inspect,” says John MacKay, vice president of Green Infrastructure Partners. “The quality control process is in place to make sure, from a physical standpoint, that the aggregate you are mining is durable enough, hard enough, and meets the physical requirements for whatever they’re going into, be that asphalt, ready mix, or even a granular.”

Since aggregates are typically produced for highly engineered use, each jurisdiction has a vested interest in verifying that the materials used for critical projects within their boundaries meet quality parameters that have been set through extensive engineering and testing.

 As Alex Caruana, national manager, Canadian Aggregates, Polydeck, notes, “Those specifications are there for a variety of reasons, and the quality control process is there to ensure the material being processed meets the specifications put out by the municipality, province or region you’re operating in. At the end of the day, it’s the way for quarries and pits to ensure their customers are getting the product they ordered, and it is suited for their purpose.”

From a broader perspective, quality control can also be seen as a control for protecting one’s business. Failing to meet specs can result in hefty fines and put aggregate producers and suppliers at risk of being excluded from bidding on work moving forward. Moreover, says MacKay, “A lot of larger owners, like the Ministry of Transportation, pay you based on the end result of your product, and that’s largely based on quality. So, if your product doesn’t meet quality, you’re going to get rejected or penalized.”

These potential consequences aren’t common in the industry, but they do serve as incentives to keep quality control top of mind. “That’s why a lot of companies have a more onerous target over and above the specification, just to allow that extra factor of safety,” explains Caruana. “If something goes wrong on any given day, the logic is that material should still meet or exceed the specification that the end purpose requires.”

 

QC PROCESS

There are key sequential steps that make up the quality control process. It begins by extracting a sample of materials from the source that will be used for testing. Some aggregate plants use automated samplers to pick material off the live belt and transport this representative sample into nearby bins or pails, where the sample is held for inspection by quality control technicians. In most plants, however, a loader is used to take a representative pad of material from a pile and place it down for a technician to then arrive and remove a sample themselves.

 “In both instances, you’re working with the law of averages,” says Caruana. “Due to gravity and inertia, when you put up a pile of aggregate, the core stone tends to go to the outer side of the pile and the fine stone tends to stay on the underside. So, if you just go in there with a loader and just take one bucket and put it down for your tech to grab a sample from, it’s not going to be representative of that entire pile. It’s either going to be coarse or fine, depending on which side your loader operator went to.”

 For this reason, when a loader is used to extract the sample, it blends the material so that, according to the law of averages, it is a representative pile. Once that pad is down, the technician uses their own shovel to take the material out in a representative way so it can be transported to their lab for testing.

 

LAB TESTING

Once a material sample is obtained from an aggregate product’s plant, it is taken to a lab for testing. Here, the sample pile is sifted through screens and separated by its individual fractions, which are then measured, counted and plotted on a graph to produce a gradation curve. At this point, technicians assess that curve to see if it fits with the maximum and minimum of the specification and the producer’s target.

The process is slightly more involved for finer materials. In this case, the fines (e.g., natural sand particles) are washed off, dried in an oven, and the dust is weighed. “This is done because dust is undesirable in an instance like concrete stone because we want that cement paste to adhere to the stones and form a very competent concrete mix,” says Caruana. “It’s like when you’re a kid and you try to tape something to a dusty surface, and it comes off the next second. It’s the same principle.”

Material may undergo other testing at the lab. This includes flat and elongated, crushed count, and abrasion testing to see how competent the stone actually is and how hard its individual particles are.

 The testing phase of the quality control process is often performed and completed on the same day. This is because aggregate plants are putting up hundreds of tonnes an hour and need to know fairly soon if their production is out of spec. If it is, there are some actions to take.

“First of all, you want to fix your problem,” says Caruana. “If it’s a blown screen or a crusher liner that’s worn out of spec, you want to find that problem and address it.”

 

NEXT STEP

The next step is determining what to do with the pile that has out-of-spec material. Here again, there are options. The material may still be able to sell for lower specific use cases, such as concrete stone. In this case, the pile may be cordoned off by the operator and saved for separate use.

“At this point, we’re calling that material something different so it can meet a different or easier spec because the operator may not wish to shut down their plant and hit a cold stop until the issue is fixed,” says Caruana. “Instead, they may choose to run the rest of the shift because the plant is running relatively well, and all the other products are in spec. Then, they’ll ship that lower spec material as ‘product number two’ instead of ‘product number one’ and then fix the issue on their maintenance time in the evening, weekend, or whenever the shutdown ends up being.”

REFEREE SAMPLES

Quality control doesn’t always end there. More often than not, municipal or provincial job contracts include provisions enabling project owners to sample the material themselves when it arrives at the jobsite. In some instances, they may even be able to take representative material from the producer’s site itself. “So, while the operator’s QC cycle may have ended after the lab, there’s also an end user quality control cycle and it behoves the producer to monitor and referee that,” advises Caruana.

Depending on the job, the project owner may send a third-party lab that might not be familiar with the site. They may also grab a sample of material that is completely different from what the material on-site is. In those instances, whether the third party is sampling at the end user site (e.g., side of the road, or at the bridge work) or coming straight to the quarry or pit, it’s in the producer’s best interest to help that third party out.

 “It’s good practice to be there to open up a conversation with that third party to say, ‘Hey, we’re shipping from here, not over there. You want to grab your sample where we’re shipping from because we’re shipping material from here because this is the premium stuff,’” says Caruana.

 Like any component of aggregate operations, the quality control process is only as accurate, reliable and effective as the people behind it. For this reason, MacKay insists, “A good quality controller is invaluable to your organization. You have to have someone who knows what to look for, and most times, a good quality control professional will be able to tell if the product is to spec or not, even before they start testing it.”

While it requires additional skills and resources, and may not always produce the hoped-for results, a strong quality control process is essential to all sand, stone and gravel operations.

Bridging the Gap

Proper PPE for women

By: Anna-Liza Badaloo

Worksites across all trades have a long way to go when it comes to providing women with well-fitting protective equipment

According to Statistics Canada, only about five per cent of skilled trades workers in Canada are women. With such low representation in a traditionally male dominated sector, women often face issues of gender bias. But some issues are literally life and death – such as having PPE that fits women properly, and this includes women working at pits and quarries in Ontario.

Recently, several changes were made to the Occupational Health and Safety Act regarding PPE and women’s on-site washrooms. But do these changes go far enough?

Leslie Dibling, an operational engagement and innovation manager at Capital Paving, doesn’t believe they do. She has been working in the skilled trades for over 10 years, specializing in safety. But she also has a personal connection that has informed her passion for safety.

“My brother was electrocuted in a workplace accident when he was 16 years old in a workplace experience program through his high school. He was doing work that he probably shouldn’t have been doing at that age,” Dibling recalls. “He wasn’t trained properly to understand the right to refuse unsafe work. Our family had to deal with a life-altering, traumatic brain injury because someone didn’t follow the proper procedures. I don’t want any family to go through what we did. I just want everyone to come home safely.”

Dibling’s biggest concern for women working on aggregate sites? PPE that doesn’t fit women properly and compromises their safety, leading to workarounds like using masking tape and rubber bands to avoid loose clothing getting caught. “PPE should only be used when other control measures are not practical,” she explains. “But employers use it because it’s an inexpensive way to control exposure, and it provides supplementary protection when other hazard controls are not there. That’s why we need it to fit properly – PPE is the last line of defence.”

Lucie Giroux, senior health and safety manager, projects and training at Lafarge Canada, has been working in health and safety for over 20 years. She points to improperly fitting full-body harnesses as a key issue for women. These harnesses are designed to wrap around the pelvis and catch you if you fall. “I’m heavier chested. If I were to fall while wearing a full-body harness and the chest strap fell below my chest, I could decapitate or amputate myself,” Giroux explains. “If the strap was above my chest, it would hit me in the face because there’s always some give in a harness.”

“If it doesn’t fit properly, you’re constantly readjusting it. That means you’re not wearing it properly,” adds Dibling. “Falling while wearing an improperly fitted harness could lead to blood loss.”

Working at heights may be the most dangerous situation that can impact women wearing improperly fitting PPE. Such falls, as Giroux notes, are the number one cause of industrial fatalities in Canada. Giroux has seen coverall cuffs so long that they become trip hazards, and the lack of properly sized steel-toed boots (mandatory on work sites) further puts women at risk of injury.

“Gloves that are too big get caught in machines and conveyor belts. Hard hats fall off.. Safety glasses that don’t žfit fog up and they can’t see properly,” Dibling says. “Most PPE standards are not gender neutral, they’re gender blind. The challenge is that women aren’t wearing it properly, or just don’t wear it at all.”

UNIQUE CHALLENGES

Even when employers are committed to providing their female employees with properly žfitting PPE, they face numerous challenges accessing the right items. “The hardest thing is žfinding good, affodable PPE that’s designed for women. It’s still not mainstream,” says Giroux. “We want to acknowledge that we have more women in the trades, but people still treat women’s PPE like a special order.”

At Lafarge Canada, safety boots must be eight inches. But there are only two kinds of safety boots made for women that meet these criteria and that don’t weigh 14 pounds each. When ordering high-visibility materials for women, Giroux frequently encounters long wait times and substantial price markups.

Another key issue? Small men’s sizes aren’t the same as PPE that is made for a woman’s body. In over two decades in the industry, Giroux has yet to see a harness that is specifically designed for women with breasts. Men often complain about wearing harnesses, even though they are designed for them. Imagine the discomfort that a female worker wearing an improperly žtting harness endures during an eight-hour day up on a roof.

When it comes to high-quality leather gloves to work with chains, lifting or rigging equipment, a men’s “Extra Small” just doesn’t cut it because women’s hands are built differently. “If you look at hips and waistlines during pregnancy, women may have to upsize two times,” notes Dibling. “They have to compromise, and the cuffs or sleeves may be too long. Women spend money to get things altered.”

PPE that’s made for women is clearly a safety issue on construction sites. But Giroux feels it’s also a sign of gender bias in the skilled trades. “As long as we have the perception that the supervisor has to go the extra mile to get PPE made for women, that gender bias will continue,” she says. “Women are not going to put themselves in that position.”

Gender bias also shows up in other ways. “At some of our sites, we’ve built a women’s bathroom and shower. Although the men have a shower, there’s a perception that female showers are an extra thing,” Giroux explains. There are already challenges in making the skilled trades enticing to women. These levels of gender bias may present an added layer of obstacles to women wanting to enter the sector.

SOLUTIONS

Ensuring that women get properly fitting PPE sounds so simple. But clearly, that isn’t the case. What could different stakeholders do to improve the situation? Giroux wants to see logistical changes on the suppliers’ end so that it’s not “such a big issue” to order PPE made for women, as well as more trade-focused advertising that indicates to female workers that they are valuable team members. Finally, there needs to be more availability and accessibility of materials.

From manufacturers, Giroux wants to see more studies on harnesses designed for women. Dibling also takes issue with the appearance of PPE for women, and how that factors into the gender bias problem. “For the longest time, PPE was pink, which creates further segregation of women in construction. I don’t want to go to a job site and wear pink PPE,” says Dibling. “Pink steel-toed boots? It’s a quick way to get made fun of. We’re doing the same job as everybody else. Why does our PPE have to look di¦erent?”

As for employers, step number one for Giroux is acknowledging the problem. “In our company, the žfirst thing that made a huge difference was being transparent and real,” she says. “Don’t turn it back on the person that has the concern. It’s one of the barriers to having more females in the workplace, and having existing females feel empowered.”

And what about industry associations like OSSGA? “They could implement a program like Women in Safety, a recognition and mentorship program that’s very femaleforward,” suggests Giroux. “Sometimes, part of the fear in the trade is being the žfirst person out. Some of the pushback is pretty brutal.”

STRICTER APPROACH

At the government level, Dibling sees an opportunity to enact stricter regulations. “Manufacturers and suppliers aren’t going to change anything if it’s not legislated. Employers need to source wider size ranges, implement gender-explicit and inclusive procurement requirements, and source measurement data to specific worker populations,” says Dibling. “Legislation needs to push it from our Green Book standards and our OHS standards.”

Giroux recalls the horrific incident on Christmas Eve 2009 in Toronto, when a scaffolding tower split and four people fell to their deaths. The Ontario government responded by looking into their Working at Heights program and implementing better training. But the risks are still very real without enforced implementation.

“Here we are 15 years later and working at heights is still the number one cause of fatalities in Canada. With female harassment and discrimination, the same phenomenon happened,” Giroux says. “Every year you have to get harassment training. But there’s no time application to either their working at heights or their harassment program. It’s easy to see why harassment programs for gender bias in the industries have failed – they failed in exactly the same way that the Working at Heights program did.”

The problem, Giroux notes, is that the government works in silos. Instead of speaking to (likely) male CEOs who are under the impression that their harassment and discrimination programs are working, Giroux wants to see the government involve women from the industry and health and safety workers in decision-making processes.

Unions also have a role to play. “They’re missing an opportunity to help their female contingent get gender-appropriate PPE,” says Giroux. “If the unions pushed harder on big business, big business would push harder on manufacturers, and people would look at things differently. Rather than making a smaller pair of gloves and calling them women’s, use a woman’s hand design for the™ glove.” “

Unions could do a much better job in negotiating proper PPE standards from the beginning, and working with suppliers to get better information,” adds Dibling. “If they used women in their unions to gather accurate data it would be a more complete information source.”

As of July 1, several changes relating to women’s PPE, female-only on-site washrooms, and hygiene were made to the Occupational Health and Safety Act. This follows a Ministry of Labour bathroom inspection blitz that took place in February, which revealed numerous violations across 1,800 construction sites, including lack of privacy and inadequate cleaning measures.

What do Dibling and Giroux think of these new changes? “Look at any other business sector. Can you imagine them saying that they don’t have a female washroom? Access to a washroom is just human dignity,” says Dibling. “The changes also say that washrooms must have adequate lighting, hand sanitizer, and running water if sanitizer isn’t possible. It’s crazy to me that we’ve had to legislate it. The next push I can see happening is for gender-neutral or gender-fluid bathrooms.”

The new legislative addition for PPE reads: Personal protective clothing and equipment that is provided, worn or used shall be a proper fit, having regard to all relevant factors including body types. “We need to take a step further where employers are responsible to provide fit analysis,” says Dibling. “Let’s train people to spot improperly žfitting PPE for women. Let’s have more classes on how to properly fit test women for respirators. And let’s have more legislation on how improperly fitting PPE can hurt women.”

Change doesn’t happen overnight. But when it comes to properly fitting PPE for women working on aggregates sites, change can’t come soon enough.

A Tall Order

Meeting ontario’s housing targets

by: Kelly Parker

Doug Ford aims to build 1.5 million new homes in Ontario – the volume of aggregate needed is immense

In late 2022, the Doug Ford government made a commitment to build 1.5 million homes in the province over the next 10 years, and it has since passed a housing bill that says will help pave the way. The construction sector is already going all-out to meet the current demand, including sourcing the huge volume of aggregate that will be required to build the homes and related infrastructure. It’s a tall order for sure.

While many people are aware of the use of aggregate in building things like streets and driveways, few people grasp the full scope of aggregate required in the construction of just one home, let alone 1.5 million homes. Greg Sweetnam, vice president of James Dick Construction, expands on how aggregate is used in the building of a house, noting that a single home build requires about 250 metric tonnes of aggregate, and around another 2,000 tonnes are required for related infrastructure. All aspects of a house require aggregates, he notes, from the quarried gypsum that’s in the drywall, to the paper covering the drywall, which has Aggregate filler in it to make it smooth.

“The glass in the windows uses a quarried product in the glass-making process, the mortar and the bricks or concrete blocks the house is made of use a specialized sand to make that mortar sand, and the roofing granules on the shingles in your house may come from quarries,” adds Sweetnam. “You know, the foundation is obvious, and the hardscape around the house, the driveways and all that, but if you weighed a typical house, over half the mass of the house is going to be aggregates.”

 For the meat and bones of a build, Sweetnam argues the importance of not just using aggregate, but using high-quality aggregate, citing the fact that the oldest buildings in Ontario might be 200 years old, while the oldest buildings in Europe are many times that, and it all comes down to the grade of aggregate used in the build.

“The CN Tower was designed to stand over a thousand years. The engineers told me the first major concrete remediation of that structure was probably going to be about1,200 years from now. But the Gardiner Expressway was built using poor-quality materials and poor construction techniques, and it started to fall down all by itself after30 years,” points out Sweetnam. “So, we ask ourselves, ‘What do we want to build Ontario with going forward?’ We argue that our industry’s job is to provide those high-quality materials.”

A single home build requires about 250 metric tonnes of aggregate, and around another 2,000 tonnes are required for related infrastructure. All aspects of a house require aggregates, from the quarried gypsum that’s in the drywall, to the paper covering the drywall

 CHALLENGES

The challenges are many for the construction industry in meeting this demand, explains Norm Cheesman, executive director of OSSGA. They include long-standing labour shortages with skilled tradespersons aging out, material shortages and more. “From people I’ve talked to in the know, the government is very concerned,” says Cheesman. “In fact, they have an interministerial committee working group right now just looking at the infrastructure challenges, the supply chain challenges, the labour challenges. Do we have enough power? Is there enough power grid? We’ve got a whole bunch of people coming into this province – do we have the capacity to absorb them? That’s a very real question that isn’t being vocalized very publicly, but it’s certainly being discussed within the halls of Queen’s Park.”

For its part, the construction industry is being very vocal with the government in an effort to help expedite the process of achieving Doug Ford’s stated goal. “We‘re trying to show the government that the more obstacles and dumb regulations, if I can use that word, you can remove, the better we will be able to do our job,” says Cheesman. “And they have said they’re trying to do this, but we come across examples all the time of regulations that are not helpful [despite] their doing their best to knock them down.”

Cheesman says that the industry is pleased with recent government messaging endorsing “close-to-market” materials sourcing. “The farther you get from the market for your supply of aggregate,” emphasizes Cheesman, “the more time and cost associated with completing a project. And I’ve heard ministers echo that statement, ‘Yes, we support aggregate sites being as close to market as possible.’ You did not hear that five, six years ago.”

“The highest quality materials are actually located much closer to the market than the poor quality materials,” echoes Sweetnam, “and you can procure them and deliver them to market cheaper than the poor-quality materials. Not only that, but you lower the greenhouse gas footprint by producing the high-quality materials that close to the market as opposed to driving a long distance to get poor-quality materials to haul in.”

TARGETING REGULATIONS

Cheesman notes that the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (MNRF) is trying to amend regulations tied to making minor changes to existing sites that already had approval for operation. “Sometimes these amendments can take months and years, and they don’t need to. So, the ministry is in the process of coming up with some changes that will speed that process up, which is good.”

The government is also amending its processes to allow companies to self-file changes. “If there’s a minor amendment to a site,” explains Cheesman, “you file it online. You don’t need consultation. You don’t need approval. They still have to comply with the law, but the bureaucratic burden will be lifted, and that’s a huge advantage to the industry.”

The aggregate industry is also closely following the government’s progress in amending regulations to allow companies to apply for a new site in areas of the protected natural heritage system. “The previous government made a change to the growth plan several years ago that said if you’re in a specific area within the growth plan – an area in southern Ontario with very specific regulations – that has endangered species, you cannot apply fora new aggregate site,” says Cheesman. “Even if you can mitigate and show that you have protected the species through other means, you still can’t apply for anew site. That removed potential new extraction from some of the most valuable aggregate areas.”

Cheesman is careful to point out that, should the regulation be changed, endangered environments and species would still be protected. “The rehabilitation has to be appropriate. We’re not at all asking to excavate and leave,” he stresses. “But there was a move away from what I would call ‘science-based thinking’ in the way regulations were developed under previous governments. And some of those regulations are now being unwound.”

“We are blessed in Ontario with fantastic people, fantastic land, fantastic climate and fantastic resources,” concludes Sweetnam, “and there is nothing stopping it from being the most prosperous, most desired place on earth to live. People just have to realize that aggregates are a component of making all that happen. We help them manifest that dream into real buildings, real hospitals, real schools and real transportation routes. I’m optimistic about Ontario’s future, but we need the public’s help to make the proper resources available (via regulation reform) to build infrastructure in a way that your tax dollars are (best invested).”

Why in my Backyard?

Understanding all the ins and outs of choosing the best site for a pit or quarry in Ontario

by: Matthew Bradford

For the average Ontarian, the distribution of pits and quarries in the province can appear unbalanced from one community to the next. However for an industry insider, there are plenty of reasons why one region might host more extraction sites than its neighbours – and the natural location of aggregate deposits tops the list.

“Deposits are only found where nature laid them down,” says David Hanratty, director of land, resource and environment, North America, with Votorantim Cimentos. “So that’s first and foremost where we have to look.”

There is far more to this than looking at a site and signing a lease or purchasing it, Hanratty adds. After a company narrows in on a potential deposit, the real qualifying work begins. “Think of the decisionmaking process like a funnel. At the top are the broad strokes: does this look like a good site? Is it in a good location?” says Hanratty. “After that comes the more complicated balancing of geological conditions and operational logistics with hydrogeological, societal and natural environment constraints. You have to take all of these into consideration in order to narrow in on the right site and find something that actually works for the material you’re trying to extract.”

An understanding of how and where aggregate deposits can be found can help raise public awareness for the site selection process. In the case of sand and gravel, for example, producers will turn their attention to deposits formed during the last glacial period, which occurred nearly 12,500 years ago. “That means they can only be found in specific places,” says Kevin Mitchell, director of property, planning and proposals with CRH Canada Group Inc. “Some areas of the province have a lot because they were spillways from the glacier meltwater, whereas some don’t. So, ultimately, we’re limited to go where nature has placed these deposits.”

Bedrock formations are more abundant but can be buried deep beneath sites that might make extraction unfeasible or uneconomical. Limestone can also be found in deposits across Ontario but can vary in quality and volume.

To narrow in on these deposits, companies will draw upon research and resources to point them in the right direction. The Ontario Geological Society’s Aggregate Resources Inventory Papers (ARIP), for instance, are highly detailed surficial geology maps and reports that provincial stakeholders often refer to in their initial sourcing stages.

As in real estate, location counts. For aggregate stakeholders, it can be appealing from a logistics and cost-saving perspective to consider locations closer to established sites, customers or pre-existing infrastructure

Still, says Mitchell, while resources like ARIP are beneficial, they only reveal part of the picture. “One challenge with the ARIPs is they reflect the entire deposit and don’t show depleted areas or regions that are sterilized by development and/or environmental constraints. Another is that many of the locations they point to have already been depleted,” he explains.

More challenging still is that everyone is looking at the same maps and reports. Throughout the sourcing process, multiple aggregate producers may be hovering around the same location, turning it into a race to identify and secure a good spot. Companies must act fast to validate and secure the sites that show potential. “In our experience, we’ve found that if a desirable location for a site has been determined, then companies do have to move quickly to secure the rights to either purchase or lease the property,” says Matt Bertram, senior project engineer with Skelton, Brumwell & Associates Inc.

In some cases, companies can work a due diligence period into their offer that allows them time to review the site and make preliminary determinations concerning its geology, hydrogeology, environmental considerations or potential restrictions. For example, says Bertram, “We were involved with a company that secured a due diligence period as part of their offer to purchase a large parcel of land, and it was very fortunate for them that they did because we learned through our preliminary work that there were some severe constraints found both on the property and within relevant planning policy that would have [made it] very difficult to successfully license the property.”

“The company ended up walking away from their purchase disappointed that they couldn’t proceed on that site,” Bertram continues, “but they were grateful that they avoided what could have been a very long and very expensive process that may not ultimately have yielded them anything.”

Adding that extra due diligence time is not always possible, especially in more competitive markets. That is when companies will weigh all the risks when making a purchase or leasing decision.

DIGGING DEEPER

While there are many regions to explore for extraction, it is not simply a matter of pointing at a map and getting ready to dig. A better understanding of the due diligence process can help the public understand why some areas are more feasible than others. “We have to find the areas with the best potential first, and even when we do narrow in, we still have to gauge the site for quality of the aggregate, the volume of aggregate, the feasibility of the location, and the ‘licensability,’” says Mitchell.

Chris Galway is senior land manager, East GTA, Eastern and Northern Ontario, for Lafarge Canada. After years in the business, he is well acquainted with the need to quickly, accurately and thoroughly access a site’s geology through resource drilling and testing. “It comes down to testing and assessing the physical properties of the sand, gravel or limestone to confirm that you can produce the highquality aggregate you need to serve the construction industry,” he says. “There are high standards to meet, and we need to makes sure we’re providing the aggregate that makes high-quality concrete or asphalt for things like condo towers, new hospitals, bridges and key infrastructure.”

A large part of the site validation process is identifying and assessing the presence and potential impact of groundwater or surface water. This too needs to be taken into consideration. “The first layer is that geology mapping, but the next is looking at the site in relation to the natural environment,” says Hanratty. “So it’s asking things like: Are there wetlands on the site or in close proximity to the site? What about the nearby landowners? Do they rely on wells, and could those be impacted from a water standpoint?”

This is where hydrogeology (groundwater) and hydrology (surface water) assessments are critical to pinpointing water issues and triggering remediation considerations. If such conditions are found, decisions must be made as to whether or not the reserve is of good enough quality to warrant the additional efforts and expenses needed to investigate and mitigate the potential impacts of extraction.

That said, sites will not typically be screened out based solely on their water conditions. True, there are “no touch” features – like provincially significant wetlands and coldwater fisheries that will likely deter future exploration – but for most other scenarios the industry is well versed in remediation efforts. “I would say we get pretty creative with respect to mitigation opportunities,” says Hanratty. “We can address a lot of groundwater and surface water challenges, but if we can select sites that have a better environmental footprint from a water standpoint, that certainly helps us narrow down potential impacts in a more manageable way.”

GETTING CLOSE

As in real estate, location counts. For aggregate stakeholders, it can be appealing from a logistics and cost-saving perspective to consider locations closer to established sites, customers or pre-existing infrastructure. “The first thing we try to find is a site with the right geological conditions. But then, we look at things like if they’re near our existing sites,” says Hanratty. “If they are, that means they can maybe become an extension of that existing operation and [we can] use the infrastructure that’s already in place, like the traffic routes, scales and processing plant.”

There are also important business considerations. For example, says Betram, “If they’re looking at virgin property, or even property already licensed but that they want to extract deeper or expand, they then have to consider the cost and time to go through the process of getting approvals either for a new licence, licence expansion, tonnage amendments, or even an amendment to go to lower depth of extraction.”

Market pricing can also come into play. In an area where there are multiple existing sites, companies must determine if the remaining material is of good enough quality, and if so, if the market demand is enough to set up operations and if their rates can be competitive with others already operating in the area.

Ultimately, even when the science and geology pan out, producers still have several site logistics and licensing considerations to work through before locking themselves in. If the question among the general public is, “Why are so many pits and quarries in my backyard?” the answer is that there was much deliberation in the decision, and every possible aspect was weighed in the balance.

“It’s an extremely complicated process to find the right site,” says Hanratty. “And while some community members might take issue with the fact that there are more aggregate sites in close proximity to them than another community down the road, that’s really from a lack of understanding of what goes on in the selection process.”

Still, understanding where those public misconceptions and frustrations come from can help everyone find common ground. “We have to empathize with their position and work with them through the process,” stresses Hanratty. “We need to show that we’re going to be taking them into consideration, operate in a way that minimizes disturbance to them, and ultimately leave the land in better condition than when we took it over.”

The Long Haul

A new report from OSSGA and the Ontario Chamber of Commerce outlines the many costs of far-from-market aggregate

by: Sarah B. Hood

In 2011, hundreds of protesters marched to Shelburne, Ontario to protest a proposed quarry on Highway 124. In 2012, a widespread ongoing public protest blocked a “mega-quarry” that had been planned for Melancthon Township. More recently, environmental groups are opposing a quarry in the Cataract area, near Caledon. Meanwhile, people across Ontario are calling for more and better housing, hospitals, roads and rail lines. For the average citizen, this may not seem like a contradiction, but anyone connected with the building industries knows that nothing gets built without aggregate.

In fact, the Greater Toronto Hamilton Area (GTHA) is a hungry consumer of aggregate, using about 73 million tonnes annually while producing just 25 million tonnes, and demand is projected to rise by 1.5 billion tonnes by 2041. Where will it all come from?

To answer that question, OSSGA commissioned a comprehensive study from the Ontario Chamber of Commerce. The resulting report, The Long Haul, Examining the Implications of Far-From-Market-Aggregates, looks at the place of aggregate within the economy of the GTHA, as well as current and future supply needs, and calculates the cost of sourcing aggregate from farther away. The findings clearly reveal the significant economic and environmental benefits of licensing quarries close to the GTHA.

“We are very pleased with the report,” says OSSGA executive director Norman Cheesman, who sat on the steering committee. He says the aggregate industry does not have a very high profile with the general public, so “it’s taken the provincial government a while to realize that we have to take action to protect this sector. This is something that the public perhaps doesn’t appreciate. With the increase in immigration and the need for Canada to bring people in, we’re going to need to build infrastructure.”

“We knew that there was a housing supply crisis and a need to build many new houses – the big question at the time was how and where,” adds Kevin Powers, managing principal at Project Advocacy Inc., who helped to co-ordinate the project with the Chamber of Commerce. “But to us, the more fundamental questions are: where are we going to get the aggregate to build this and is it available?”

The Long Haul offers some answers. It looks at the value of Ontario aggregate, both upstream (in aggregate production) and downstream (in such industries as construction and the manufacture of concrete and cement). The upstream figures alone are impressive: “In 2019, the $1.7 billion of new production generated by the aggregate industry translated into an estimated $2.9 billion in total gross output, $1.6 billion in GDP, $806 million in labour income and 13,400 jobs in Ontario.”

In addition, this activity provided various levels of government with some $150 million in tax revenues. Downstream activities brought about another $103 million into tax coffers, and resulted in “an estimated $3.7 billion in gross output, $1.8 billion in GDP, $1 billion in labour income, and 14,000 jobs.”

The Long Haul also examines the economic implications of “far-frommarket” aggregate, meaning the expected costs of sourcing aggregate farther away from its end users. The report shows that the 25 million tonnes of aggregate produced annually in the GTHA travels an average of 35 kilometres to market. What would happen if that quantity of material had to be brought into the area from farther afield? Given the locations of the closest alternative extraction sites, the average travel distance would increase to about 110 kilometres, costing an extra $169 million, more than double current transportation costs.

This would mean higher costs for many public-sector projects. The report demonstrates that it would add nearly $300,000 to the cost of building one kilometre of a four-lane freeway, about $6.2 million to the cost of an average subway extension project, $510,000 to the cost of an average hospital build, and about $55 million to the cost of maintaining Toronto streets for one year – 1.4 per cent of the city’s current annual spending on infrastructure.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

The environmental implications are considerable, and it is not surprising that with so much extra hauling, aggregated sources far from the market take a big toll on the environment, including the addition of approximately 89,000 metric tonnes of GHG emissions. The report points out that “by 2030, when the carbon price reaches $170 per tonne, the added emissions will cost more than $15 million.”

“This is not sustainable for the province’s plans for affordable housing or emissions targets,” Cheesman said when the report was released. “This is why we have been asking for a public policy review to remove restrictions from closeto-market aggregate, while fully enforcing the rigorous provisions of the Aggregate Resources Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Environmental Production Act and the 21 other pieces of legislation the industry must comply with.”

According to Powers, “The environmental case is an important one, because most of the time the opponents of new quarries will say that quarries are bad for the environment and they should be placed elsewhere, but elsewhere you’re still going to be digging for aggregate, and the environmental cost is even greater.”

“In the GTHA, many of the communities that are opposing new aggregate applications are the same ones that have declared a climate emergency,” Powers adds, “and it’s important for them to realize that a climate emergency doesn’t just mean making bike lanes. It means making tough decisions for the climate.”

Finally, The Long Haul provides a case study of the cost implications of closing just one quarry in the GTHA – the Nelson Aggregate Co. Burlington Quarry – which produces dolostone and is currently awaiting a licence to expand. The study postulates that if Nelson does receive the licence for expansion, “it will continue to operate and produce its base annual extraction volume of two million tonnes of aggregates. If it is unsuccessful, it would close and no longer produce any aggregates.”

In order to supply the area with a similar quantity of dolostone, the study shows that over the following 10 years, “the total incremental transportation costs generated as a direct result of Nelson quarry’s closure will amount to $206.3 million.” In addition, “diesel fuel consumption amounts to 5.8 million liters over 10 years… translating into nearly 16,000 metric tonnes of CO2 emissions.”

Furthermore, the closure of the business would come with a cost for the City of Burlington, since the Nelson quarry currently employs 109 individuals directly and indirectly. “From a revenue standpoint,” the report notes, “a licence approval for Nelson quarry is estimated to generate over $320,000 annually for the City of Burlington and over $125,000 for the greater Halton Region through property taxes and aggregate levies.”

“What is most surprising is to see the impact that not licensing just one quarry has downstream,” says Powers. “Over the course of 10 years, supply falls off the cliff – just because of one quarry. So, the takeaway from this study is that to meet the challenge of the housing supply crisis, this government needs to continue to license new quarries close to where these houses are being built.

From Pit to Picturesque Countryside

What it really means to surrender an aggregate licence or permit in Ontario: follow a site’s life cycle on the TOARC website

by: Carly Holmstead


It’s an age-old question: what happens to a pit or quarry once extraction has been completed and the licence or permit is surrendered? It is hard to believe that thousands of sites have been surrendered and that communities often never know they were once home to an aggregate extraction site.

By definition, surrendered aggregate licensed and permitted sites are sites where extraction has been completed, where rehabilitation has taken place per the site plan, and where the licence/permit has been relinquished by the licencee/permittee to the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF).

So, back to the question. What happens to a pit or quarry once the licence is surrendered? Pits and quarries are a temporary land use, so before the licence is surrendered to the MNRF final rehabilitation is completed.

REHABILITATION: IT’S THE LAW!

The rehabilitation of pits and quarries is an important step in the sustainable management of aggregate resources in the province. In fact, to have a licence/permit for extraction, producers must have a formal rehabilitation plan fully in place. Consultation with the public, conservation authorities, municipalities, Indigenous communities and the MNRF all contribute to determining the land use after extraction.

This use could be wetlands, agricultural fields, natural areas, parks or waterbodies. “Proper rehabilitation helps to transition from a land-use of aggregate extraction to other productive land-use activities, which reduces land-use conflict and addresses social, economic and environmental concerns,” say Danielle Solondz, program manager for The Ontario Aggregate Resources Corporation (TOARC). R

ehabilitation looks different at each site and really depends on what the surrounding land is used for. “When rehabilitation is done correctly, to the naked eye you would never know it was once an aggregate extraction site, and that is really the ultimate goal,” says Solondz.

Exceptional rehabilitation practices exist and are often applied, but they can go unnoticed and unappreciated by the public due to a lack of information. The Surrendered Sites Reporting and Mapping Tool (eSurrender), located through TOARC’s website, allows community members to see a surrendered site, photos of the rehabilitated land, and a breakdown of the land use – all in one place. “The public can use the tool to better grasp what the end use of the site will look like,” says Solondz. “It is often hard to imagine how an open aggregate site will blend in with surrounding landscape when rehabilitation is completed.”

 eSurrender allows for a more transparent process and better knowledge of the types of rehabilitation that can be completed. Some people may even be surprised to find that their favourite park was once an aggregate site that helped build their community, Solondz explains.

ESURRENDER: LOCATING SITES

eSurrender is an electronic database of surrendered aggregate licences and permits in the province of Ontario. Developed by TOARC in response to the 2013 Review of the Aggregate Resources Act by the Standing Committee of General Government, it provides information on the end-use of restored aggregate sites.

The tool helps bridge communication and informational gaps between the aggregate industry and the public by communicating the end-use/rehabilitation of pits and quarries across Ontario. It uses Google Earth, so users can locate all surrendered sites within the TOARC database by simply scrolling through the map.

The tool allows users to explore siteby-site and details the surrendered licence or permit number, the date surrendered, the status, operation type, licensed/ permitted area, locational information, current and surrounding land uses, as well as a photographic record. The Surrendered Sites Reporting and Mapping Tool provides a more complete understanding of the end-use of former pits and quarries.

BREAK IT DOWN: SURRENDERED PIT

When a site is surrendered, TOARC is notified, and staff create a file in the surrendered site database. During the field season, staff will inventory the site to categorize what the end use is (at the time of the visit), review satellite imagery to review surrounding land use types, and take a photographic record. All information is stored in a central database and a curated version is uploaded to the eSurrender reporting tool on TOARC’s website while protecting the privacy of the individual landowners.

Each site is identified on a map with a red pin, and once a user clicks on a pin, the below information will populate.

WHAT YOU’LL SEE:

Date Licenced/Permitted: Unknown

Date Surrendered: 2010-11-24

TOARC Status: Surrendered Operation

Type: Pit Licence

Type: Class A Licence Licenced Area (ha): 14.77

TOARC Site Visit Status: Visited

County: Halton

Township: Nassagaweya

Lot: Pt. 1 & 2 Concession: VII

Licence Location: Known

Current Land Usage (2017): Natural - Meadow/Grassland/Prairie: 80% Water - Wetland: 20%

Surrounding Land Usage (2017): Recreational: 40% Natural: 35% Agriculture: 20% Multiple: 5%

While this tool is an excellent way to provide transparency to the community, it is also important to note that this is just a snapshot in time. Some sites may have been rehabilitated as per the site plan, but the land use may have changed over time. This tool provides a more transparent process for the community and gives members an opportunity to see firsthand what the end use of a site looks like. Take a moment to explore the website and maybe even do a tour around your community to explore in-person a former pit or quarry!

TOARC: An Aggregate Truthsayer

How the ontario aggregate resource coporation rectifies misconceptions surrounding aggregate

by: Warren Heeley

The environmental footprint being left on our planet has become an important international issue. Climate change, reduction of carbon and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and impact on natural resources are leading measuring sticks for establishing an industry’s footprint.

Yet when it comes to the aggregate industry, there is a disconnect between public perception and the reality of the industry’s actual “footprint.” This disconnect also extends to the important role aggregate plays in our society.

Aggregate touches our lives in one way or another every day; without it, countless lifestyle products and infrastructure needs would not be available. Aggregate is also strictly governed by more than 24 acts and regulations that include a long list of environmental requirements.

Still, increasing opposition to production and the need for high volumes of aggregate have placed an unwarranted stigma on the industry. Some concerns are legitimate and elicit constructive responses from the industry; others are simply unsubstantiated “truths” meant to undermine the industry.

The Ontario Aggregate Resources Corporation (TOARC) plays a key role in in helping the public understand exactly how and where aggregate is produced in Ontario. The organization’s research is vital to disassembling misconceptions and setting the record straight. As such, it performs a critical function not just in information-sharing, but also in ensuring environmental accountability.

“Our responsibilities include administration of levies on aggregate production, rehabilitation of abandoned (legacy) pits and quarries and, where licences or permits have been revoked, the production of aggregate statistics, research on rehabilitation, and education of those interested in the aggregate industry,” explains TOARC president Bruce Semkowski.

"Our statistics from 1998 to 2021 show the number of licences has fallen.  The licensed area is basically flat, and disturbed land has shown a slight increase since 2007, which takes into account the additional land in 2016” Bruce Semkowski, TOARC

TOARC was formed in 1997 and is the trustee of the Aggregate Resources Trust created under the Aggregate Resources Act (ARA) in an agreement with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. Below is a brief overview of the critical work it conducts in the aggregate industry.

AGGREGATE FEES

TOARC has the responsibility to collect levies and crown royalties from aggregate producers in the province. Aggregate producers are aggregate licence, permit and wayside permit holders. The 3,600 licensees and 2,500 permit holders pay more than $30 million in fees dispersed to the provincial and municipal governments each year.

Once collected, TOARC distributes these monies back to municipal and provincial governments. The aggregate industry is the only industry that pays a levy whose intent is to help fund local infrastructure repair.

“TOARC is also responsible to conduct random audits of licence and permit holders’ production submissions and educate the holders on how the levy process works,” says Tahir Ahmad, controller at TOARC. “This ensures the levies are correct for the aggregate volume being removed from the site and the levy process is performing properly.”

Audit selection each year is primarily random or if there is an unusual fluctuation in a holder’s annual report or a written request is received from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. Audits include visiting the producer’s facilities and inspection of all financial, sales and other reports they need to verify reported production amounts.

REHABILITATION

TOARC has been responsible for the rehabilitation of legacy pits and quarries for qualifying landowners, at no cost, since 1992 (where extraction was completed prior to today’s rigorous standards). Rehabilitation of these sites is funded by a portion of the aggregate levy that is placed in a special Rehabilitation Fund.

“The Management of Abandoned Properties (MAAP) program is run by TOARC. These sites were created from small-scale operations and mainly utilized by municipalities to create their own infrastructure,” explains Danielle Solondz, program manager at TOARC. “The fund also supports research into mining, delivery of aggregate and new rehabilitation approaches for the difficult environments associated with these sites. Rehabilitation of revoked licences and permits also falls under TOARC’s mandate.”

As an example of TOARC’s work in this area, in 2021 the four-year Rapid Ecological Restoration for Aggregate Sites (RERAS) study was completed. The main goal of the research was to determine if it was possible to develop strategies to restore ecosystem services of a mature natural mixed wood forest within a 30- to 40-year timeframe (the typical lifespan of an aggregate operation in southern Ontario) rapidly, completely and cost-effectively.

The RERAS experiment used two approaches to determine methods that may be capable of overcoming habitat constraints using progressive and natural regeneration strategies. The researchers determined that translocating living mulch from a mature “donor” deciduous forest, such as one requiring removal in preparation for quarrying, to nearby afforested lands rapidly advanced the state of understory succession at the recipient experimental sites. The full study can be found at toarc.com.

The study was led by the University of Waterloo, School of Environment, Resources & Sustainability and supported by TOARC, Walker Industrial Holdings Ltd (via its subsidiary, Walker Aggregates Inc.), and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

STATISTICS

The collection and publication of relevant aggregate statistics about the industry is also an important TOARC responsibility. The annual statistics are collective numbers for current licences, permits, hectares licensed and permitted, as well as hectares disturbed in areas covered by the ARA.

TOARC statistics have recently been misinterpreted by interest groups looking to oppose the industry. As a result of new areas of Ontario becoming subject to the ARA over the years, it is difficult to look at year-to-year comparisons. But as the analysis outlined in the sidebar on the previous page demonstrates, the number of pits and quarries and the disturbed land in Ontario has essentially remained the same for the last 24 years.

EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Educating and training people who are interested in the industry is another important responsibility of TOARC as part of an effort to bridge the communication gap between industry and the public as well as provide a non-biased communication forum. The program is funded by income from the Trust.

Two popular TOARC communication resources are the MAAP Online Reporting Tool and eSurrender, an electronic database. The first covers the status of more than 8,000 legacy sites in Ontario, while the electronic database lists surrendered aggregate licences and permits and provides information on the end-use of restored aggregate sites. These rehabilitation resources help the public understand rehabilitation and appreciate efforts being made by TOARC and the industry in this area.

In summary, since its inception in 1997 TOARC has played an important role in the aggregate industry. Its research and education efforts have helped advance the science around rehabilitation, while the stewardship role it plays in collecting, disbursing and auditing the aggregate levy ensures a transparent and efficient system.

TOARC’s mandate to help educate anyone with an interest in aggregate is important so we can all gain a better understanding of the industry that provides such essential materials to build Ontario. •

Setting the Record Straight on Aggregate

Where it’s used, annual volume used and licensing requirements

by: Warren Heeley

Aggregate.  Ontarians simply cannot live without it. Aggregate, or stone, sand and gravel, touches almost every aspect of our lives in one way or another. We all use or come in touch with aggregate every day whether it is the roads we drive on or the homes we live in. Consider this:  you can step on to your front porch, look around, and find more than 20 uses of aggregate  all around you.   

A hundred years ago when a new road needed to be built, or a new housing development was planned, a local deposit of aggregate would be found  to supply the sand, stone and gravel for roads, buildings and other infrastructure. These materials were mined at the site and transported a short distance to where it was needed. When the job was done, the site where the aggregate was produced would simply be left to eventually be rehabilitated by native plants and trees. 

Today, the Aggregate Resources Act (ARA) stands at the heart of a sophisticated, and rigorous legislative and policy framework that sets stringent requirements that must be met before aggregate licences are issued.  The act and its accompanying regulations, policies and standards govern aggregate pits and quarries on both private and provincial land.  The jurisdiction of the ARA, which was originally focused on southern Ontario, has been expanded to now include nearly every area of the province.   

According to the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry, Graydon Smith, the Ministry “regulates the extraction of aggregates in Ontario. This includes issuing licences and permits, approving amendments to existing sites, and performing compliance activities. The Ministry strives to be responsive to concerns raised by the industry and the general public through inspections, responding to complaints, and ensuring the industry meets requirements for rehabilitating extraction sites. Ontario is built on a foundation of aggregates. The industry is vital to creating a more connected and prosperous province by supplying the resources to build key infrastructure projects and the 1.5 million homes Ontario needs over the next 10 years.

Unfortunately, aggregate production has been the subject of ongoing opposition from various interest groups despite the rigid regulations the industry has to meet and the fact that it is such a vital commodity for so many Ontario necessities.  

Below we set the record straight on where aggregate is used, the annual volume of aggregate produced in the province, as well as licensing requirements

What are we doing with all of this aggregate? 

Knowing where aggregate is used is difficult for the public to notice because in almost every case aggregates are “hidden” from sight under or within common everyday items such as roads and buildings. People in Ontario literally come in contact with aggregate “every minute of every day”. Whether it’s the windows in homes and office buildings or filtering and purification of water, aggregates play a significant role in the day-to-day lives of Ontarians. 

Here is a short list of some of the key uses: 

1. Concrete, cement and mortar – the largest percentage of aggregates are used for manufacturing concrete and cement; mortar for bonding bricks and cement blocks also use aggregates 

2. Asphalt and roadstone – roads and other pavement uses (e.g., airport runways, school playgrounds, etc.) account for the second largest use of aggregates; unpaved roads and parking areas also use aggregates to create a more stable surface for vehicles in all types of weather 

3. Foundations – aggregates are used around building foundations during construction as backfill because it will easily compact as versus soil and creates a solid base for the building that is resilient to the affects of weather. 

4. Railway ballast – aggregates provide the bed to support railway tracks and the enormous weight of a loaded train as well as protect the ground around the track and underground structures the tracks pass over. Railway aggregates used are made from tougher stone (e.g., igneous rock) and contain large pieces in the mix. 

5. Agriculture – aggregates (particularly limestone) are used in the agricultural sector to increase the lime content of soil for crops and trees that is lost by rainwater leaching and the use of fertilizers. 

6. Water filtration, drainage and pipe protection – aggregates are used for water filtration and sewage treatment processes; to drain surface water and protect underground pipes and conduits 

7. Whitening agents and fillers – aggregates (particularly limestone) are used to make whitening agents and fillers for a variety of uses including paper, paint, plastics, and cleaning products. 

 

Interestingly enough, people think that the more significant use of aggregate is in urban areas. In fact, the opposite is true. More aggregate is used in the rural areas versus the urban areas on a per capita basis. 

How much stone, sand and gravel do we use in Ontario? 

In recent years, the annual volume of aggregate extracted from pits and quarries in Ontario has been questioned by interest groups; particularly whether this amount is “really needed”. A look at the actual numbers and the process whereby aggregate requirements are determined annually by producers needs to be examined to sort out this issue. 

According to Norm Cheesman, executive director of the Ontario Sand, Stone & Gravel Association (OSSGA), “The average annual production of aggregate in the province over the last number of years has been 164,000 million tonnes.  And the amount of aggregate used in Ontario has been – approximately 164,000 million tonnes.  What that simply means is that producers match their production to meet the needs of their customers.  They only extract what they are able to sell.  This is exactly the same as a good baker who only bakes as many loaves of bread as he or she is able to sell.”   

Cheesman adds that some of the confusion on this topic stems from the difference between the amount of aggregate taken out of the ground each year (produced) and the amount of land that producers have that has been granted a licence to extract under the ARA.   

Aggregate producers need to have many aggregate licences located in various places in across the province for a number of important reasons: 

  • Aggregate only exists where nature put it.  Created by glaciers and geological forces over hundreds and thousands of years, the amount of stone, sand and gravel varies significantly across the province.  In addition, depending on the formulation of the material, some is very strong, some is not. Going back to our baker example – you can think of it like different types of flour.  It takes a variety of products that need to be mixed together to get the right kind of aggregate to build quality buildings.  Often that means you take a little pit from one site, a little bit from another site, and blend them together to get the right mix. 

  • Another important factor is that the aggregate has to be close to the project – because from both an economic and environmental point of view, you want to minimize the amount of trucking. You need sites located across the province, and many sites in areas where there is significant growth, like the greater golden horseshoe.  Again, no different to a chain of grocery stores – who will have retail outlets across the country.  

“Transportation is up to 60% of the cost of aggregates” says Cheesman. “Every extra kilometer aggregate has to be trucked to a jobsite means 2.5 million more litres of fossil fuel are needed annually which creates 6,907 tonnes of GHG.” 

The GTA which consumes 40% of the provincial aggregates can be used as a good example. The difference in GHG emissions between long distance trucking (from northern Ontario) as versus close to market trucking in the GTA is significant. Long distance trucking annually requires twice as many trucks (500 versus 250) and generates 3.6 times as much GHG (47 million versus 13 million). It makes sense both economically and environmentally to locate “pits and quarries close to where the aggregate will be used.” 

What does all of this mean?  According to Cheesman, “A large part of the aggregate business is managing the resources and estimating what the needs of the local users will be over the coming years. Producers take a long term view of the resource they are licensed to produce that extends out 10-20 years.” The public should think of licences as deposits of material that are safeguarding aggregate resources to be used to meet the needs of the next generation of Ontarians.  With immigration projections of 500,000 annually and the requirement to build 1.5 million homes over the next decade there’s no question we will need aggregate.   

“And remember” says Cheesman, “To meet all of the studies, public consultation, and rigour that goes into getting a licence, it is not uncommon for the process to take as long as ten years.” 

For this reason, aggregate in most sites are not extracted from the ground until they are needed. In certain cases, the land containing the aggregate will not be worked by the producer for a number of years. During this time, the producer will make it available for other uses such as agriculture. In other cases, the producer will begin extraction of aggregates because of its quality and a local need for that type of aggregate for projects. 

But to be responsible stewards of the resource, it’s important for aggregate producers to ensure there will be material ready for construction projects today – and for projects that will be scheduled 20 years into the future. 

The aggregate industry is overseen by ARA, an act and regulation that governs management of this resource province wide. Producers take a responsible approach to managing such an important resource in the province. Every kilogram of aggregate produced annually is used in the many products and projects that require it. Licensing of producers is only part of the process. Looking at the future and planning to meet the needs of a growing population in Ontario is a vital part of their business. This is some of the “straight goods” on aggregates. Be sure to read part two of this article in this issue. 

For more information on aggregates go to the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry website or the Ontario Sand Stone and Gravel Association (OSSGA) https://www.ossga.com/

40 YEARS LATER…

A novel study on a gravel pit rehabilitated four decades ago sheds light on the need for native species and ongoing maintenance

By Warren Heeley

In 2018, The Ontario Aggregate Resources Corporation (TOARC) partnered with the University of Guelph Arboretum to study a 40-year-old rehabilitated gravel pit on the university’s Arboretum land. The findings, published this past March, were revealing.

Inventories of the woody plant species showed that 53 of the 90 species originally planted had survived and 41 of these species showed signs of self-generation and expansion beyond the original planting area. A number of the large trees originally planted had grown well and made up the current upper canopy in the gravel pit.

In terms of soil samples collected from the pit area and Victoria Woods, an old-growth forest beside it, researchers discovered that “higher values of key plant nutrients (phosphorous and potassium) exist at the gravel pit compared to Victoria Woods.” While appearing positive at the outset, this could be the result of a more balanced plant community in the Woods that is consuming all of these nutrients leaving very little in the soil samples.

Somewhat discouraging was that invasive species made up the top species found in the pit; however, this was also understandable given that some were included in the original plantings.

“In certain cases, the invasive species were planted as a part of the original rehab work as they would have been considered best practices at that time,” states Danielle Solondz, program manager at TOARC. “Other species simply invaded the site. The study determined that the top five species found in the pit were invasive, but it should be noted that these species are common in any ecosystem if not removed manually.”

To deal with the prominence of invasive species, the study determined that rehabilitation sites may need ongoing maintenance. “In addition to planting native species, there may need to be an approach used from the beginning of the rehab process to keep out or remove invasive species,” says Solondz.

The study also highlighted that maintenance approaches for such sites may need to be reassessed on a regular basis and that 40 years is simply too long to leave a site without maintenance. As Solondz emphasizes, “TOARC and producers can set a site up for success, but land stewardship is a key part of creating valuable ecosystems.”

LENGTHY PROJECT

Founded in 1970 on nearly 400 acres, the Arboretum encompasses many land types, including a section that contained a legacy gravel pit. It was the rehabilitation of that pit, conducted between 1976 and 1978, that the TOARC research project examined. The original rehabilitation included the planting of more than 90 woody plant species throughout the pit area, which were left to naturalize over the next 40 years.

To determine the results of that rehabilitation, the Arboretum approached TOARC to support a joint research study, with TOARC providing funding and inhouse support with their rehabilitation expertise. As the trustee of the Ontario Aggregate Resources Trust, TOARC is responsible for rehabilitating more than 8,200 legacy pits and quarries in Ontario.

The primary goals of the study were: to discover if the biodiversity of the site improved, to apply the results to future rehab practices, and to see how the site was integrating into the Guelph area urban sprawl that grew over the 40-year period. It aimed to answer three key questions:

  1. What are the major changes that have occurred in terms of woody plant survival, abundance and colonization over the last 40 years as the site has naturalized?

  2. How can the site continue to improve in terms of integrating it into the wider habitat matrix for the benefit of native biodiversity?

  3. What findings can be taken away that could apply to similar locations?

THE APPROACH

To determine the answers to the study’s key questions, the team required records of the rehabilitation work going back to the 1970s, including planting maps and notes made by the original rehab team. By accessing archived documents, they were able to develop a geographic information system (GIS) that included planting lists and original planting maps and locations in the pit.

Work started in January 2021, and by August the research team had collected data on the current state of the woody plant inventory. In addition, they recorded assessments of soil and vegetation. They faced several challenges, however, including the fact that soil conditions in many cases were either not kept or were lost in the historic records, and the same number of each plant species was not always planted, which complicated the process of systematic comparisons.

As well, the original planting had included a number of woody plant species that would not be included in present-day rehabilitation because of their tendency to become invasive. As experts now know, the planting of native species is critical to sustainable rehabilitation projects. That said, even with native species, it is difficult to restrict invasive woody plant seeds from being carried into the site by wind or other means.

Another consideration derived from the study is the acceptability of woody plants to provide potential benefits to wildlife, pollinators and other such species through flowering, fruit bearing and habitats. This highlights the need for diversity in the plants used in the rehab process to increase the site’s resiliency to harsh environmental conditions. “A wider ecological approach allows practitioners to capitalize on potential species–dependent interactions, such as insect pollinated woody plants, or the use of cavity‐forming tree species to help support birds and small mammals in the future,” states the study report.

Diversity in restoration brings up a recurring question also raised in the report, namely how many species of woody plants should be used to meet appropriate diversity levels? There is no definitive answer to this as the field is still relatively new, states the report. However, it cites a 2001 report by Loreau et al that states: “A line of thought in the field of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning is that biodiversity begets biodiversity, thus it could be predicted that maximizing the diversity of suitable plants on any given site should maximize the opportunities for the diversity of animals, fungi, and other plants facilitating the site along its chosen trajectory.”

The report also supports moving to a more future-focused strategy by recognizing that rehabilitation is an evolving process and sites need to be visited and looked at regularly. “Revisiting sites over time encourages continued ecosystem functioning and mitigates the effects of invasive plant species, which is often more effective given that disturbed areas are generally more vulnerable,” it states.

As such, it’s important to understand that the long-term success of the rehabilitation process depends on the commitment of the landowner. To ensure a successful restoration, the owner of the land must provide ongoing land stewardship and care for the ecosystem.

MAIN TAKEAWAY

Without question, the TOARC and University of Guelph research study raises the bar on best practices for the rehabilitation of pits and quarries. In the near future, for instance, its results will be compared against results from a similar site that used a passive yet more regular approach to maintenance and dealing with the invasive species challenge.

Most importantly, however, the study shows that rehabilitation does work, even when initially conducted with somewhat dated methodology in terms of plant species.

“The most important takeaway from the Arboretum project is the opportunity to review a site in this detail, 40 years after it’s been rehabilitated, and see such positive results,” states Solondz. “The results concerning invasive species and regular maintenance on sites is part of the learning experience that helps the industry continue on the right path.”

To access a copy of the gravel pit research study, go to https://toarc.com/legacy-pits-quarriesmaap/research-funding/research-publications/ and click on the link under “A 40-year Research and Demonstration Project.” The woody plant inventory and the soil samples are seen by the research team as “an important metric for comparison of the site in the future.”

Moving from Stone to Concrete

Moving from Stone to Concrete

It is not one of Ontario’s most famous bridges, but the Canal Lake Concrete Arch Bridge holds a special place in the history of this country’s concrete structures. Located on the Trent-Severn waterway system between Balsam Lake and Lake Simcoe, it’s affectionately known to summer visitors in the area as the ‘Hole-in-the-Wall Bridge’ because of its appearance: a single arch braced by abutments on either shore.

A Breath of Fresh Air

A Breath of Fresh Air

The control of fugitive dust at aggregate sites is something that members of the Ontario Stone, Sand and Gravel Association (OSSGA) take very seriously. From the licensing process through to final rehabilitation, operators must consider the potential impacts of fugitive dust and ensure that “dust is mitigated onsite,” a phrase embedded in the conditions on almost every site plan.

Working with Our Neighbours

Working with Our Neighbours

Equally important is the image producers portray to the communities located in the vicinity of their pits and quarries. Public consultation and ongoing relationships are vital in order to reduce the negative stigma of the sites and affirm aggregate producers as members of the community, like any other business. It isn’t always easy, but it is critical to a site’s success.